[geeks] Virtualization Smackdown

Bryan Fullerton fehwalker at gmail.com
Sun Oct 19 08:41:53 CDT 2014


On 17/10/2014 4:15 PM, Mike Meredith wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:24:15 -0400 (EDT), Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
>> First, the highest performance you will get, is from OpenVZ -
>> provided you can live with its limitations.
> Not familiar with OpenVZ, but I've been using Linux
> Containers/LXC/Docker myself ever since a T1000 with a bunch of zones
> blew up and I had to replace it in a hurry[0].
>
> Took about half an afternoon to get up to speed with LXC and a morning
> to get two DNS slaves up and running.
>
> "Lightweight virtual machines"[1] do (as mentioned) tend to run at full
> i/o speed. Could be a little clunky to set up (at least lxc was at the
> time), but rock solid ever since.
>
> I've got access to ESX in spades at $work, but unless I need Windows,
> my test machines are most likely to be containers.

Yes, if I was building a smallish environment with no Windows I'd be 
looking at LXC and Docker as well. We're already trying it at work for 
local testing (instead of Vagrant) and are planning to start testing CI 
builds.

If I was building out a larger cloud Linux setup I'd be looking at 
OpenStack, but it looks like one of those systems where the upfront time 
investment equation makes more sense the more machines you're managing. 
(I could be wrong, I haven't played with it extensively)

Bryan
http://www.avast.com


More information about the geeks mailing list