[rescue] 3b1/7300/unixpc/s4 history [was: Wanted - 3B2]
wa2egp at att.net
wa2egp at att.net
Wed Jul 9 09:16:25 CDT 2008
> 3.51m, -not- alas sVr3
Yep, that's it. Been a long time with too much other crap in between.
> iirc the previous release was 3.51c. some time before that was 3.0
> and before that 2.0. iirc another grp was working on sVr3 for the
> unixpc but it was never released or afaik even completed. 3.51m was
> the final polish on the berkeley-based convergent unix. like hp-ux up
> to 9, it was reworked to meet the svid but not sV-based*.
>
> " > i also wanted to do a qic-40 floppy tape driver. i still don't know
> " > enough about driver programming today.
>
> i was starting to think about the floppy tape driver around the time
> of 3.51m, and if i'd been a hotshot kernel driver programmer it
> would've been included.
>
> " > the one schematic the manual lacks is the video chip.
> "
> " Figures.
>
> it is a little odd since afaik it's a custom chip just for the unixpc.
>
> " If nothing else, the 3B1/7300 looked cool. A number of years ago, I brought
> " one to school and left it on my desk on to see if the little propeller-heads
> " could crack the password. Never happened.
>
> i recall there was a way to make a backdoor that would give you root
> access, but not what it was. i used it -once- to break into a system
> for which the root passwd was lost.
My way was just reinstall the OS. OK, so I didn't know much then. :) (then?)
>
> i still fondly recall the menu system that would string-match what you
> typed instead of the pc-legacy just taking single chars.
>
> * i was once personally told by an hp-ux developer that the sV kernel
> was 'crap'. i would guess sun thought so too, as solaris 2 made
> significant progress in performance and stability when they rewrote
> the kernel, about 2.4 iirc.
I wouldn't know enough to say if a kernel is crap or not. For what little I did with it, it was fine for me. The only thing I regretted was that I never got it on line. My ISP of that time was text-based although the 1200 baud modem would be a little slow. :)
Bob
More information about the rescue
mailing list