[rescue] best NetBSD support

[George Adkins]

> > Better Idea, how about *completing* support on any one of the currently
> > 'supported' arch's in which:
> > a. 'supported' = boots to single user (sometimes)
> > b. 'supported' = some variants of the machines, but not all (Sable &
> > Lynx) c. 'supported' = the machines, but not the peripheral bus (EISA or
> > MCA) d. 'supported' = console only, or 8 bit only...
> >
> > need I go on?
>
> I wish people would try to get one simple fact about free software
> through their thick skulls:  

*Sigh* My complaint is not that the volunteers haven't jumpped up and "met my 
demands", it's that the (dis)organization of NetBSD developers produces a 
dozen half-baked ports and has the unmitigated gall to call the archetecture 
"supported" so that they can stick another feather in their cap...  and then 
run off to port it to the latest variety of Nintendo to hit the market.

So, Greg, which are you?  "Deep pockets", or a volunteer?  You seem pretty 
defensive about this, are you one of those developers who orphans half-baked 
software and contributes to making the whole "Free Software" community look 
that much more like a bunch of rank amateurs?

George