[SunHELP] [50% solved, but need help ; -)]Sol10 - fsck problem / on SunSparc-AXMP
Michael Karl
mk at lexcom-net.de
Mon Mar 30 12:39:49 CDT 2009
Hello,
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-2530/6mi6gg883?a=view
1. I didn't make metaroot and metaclear to the mirrors on root ... I'm
asking why ?
2. If I metadetach all submirrors of the boot-disk, I'm thinking that I
must be able to boot directly the "first-boot"-disk and the
"mirror-boot"-disk via ok-prompt ... but now I could only boot the
"first-boot"-disk without "1." well ... but the "mirror-boot"-disk-root
is not clean for booting ... may be it's not in sync.
3. I don't remember, how I solved this problem in the past. I'm
thinking: metadetach the submirror, upgrading with patch-cluster the
"first-disk", looking for working of the "first-disk", metattach the
submirrors if everything is working ... if not, I boot the metadetached
mirror and make with metattach the sync to the "first-disk" to the
original state.
Where is my mistake now ?
Thanks Michael
Michael Karl schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> listmail schrieb:
>> metastat says there are problems?
> everything was OK before metadetach the submirrors.
>> Did you run metaroot to revert vfstab to use the physical slice
> no ... why ... if one hd fail, it should work without using metaroot
> ... I'm thinking.
>> and then metadetach all (secondary) sub mirror(s) before rebooting?
> yes
>> And after you rebooted did you use metaclear on the (secondary) sub
>> mirrors and then metaclear -r each toplevel mirror?
> no ... why ?
>> And then perhaps also use metadb to delete the state replicas so
>> that metadb -i returns nothing.
> ok
>> You can still boot right?
> yes ... with the first disk after I corrected the
> openbootprom-enviroment. But this misconfiguration of the obp was the
> reason, that the metadetached mirror-disk didn't start with
> inode-errors. I'm thinking, that my way was wrong yesterday.
> 1. metadetach all submirrors
> 2. init 5
> 3. replacing ram-module
> 4. switch on and boot without any parameters
>>
>> please show
>> # metastat
> Sorry ... german output ;-)
>
> # metastat
> d7: Spiegel
> Untergeordneter Spiegel 1: d70
> Status: OK
> Kontrolllauf: 1
> Leseoption: roundrobin (Standard)
> Schreiboption: parallel (Standard)
> Grv_e: 12902400 Blvcke (6,2 GB)
>
> d70: Untergeordneter Spiegel von d7
> Status: OK
> Grv_e: 12902400 Blvcke (6,2 GB)
> Stripe 0:
> Gerdt Startblock Daten Status Wiede Hot-Spare
> c1t0d0s7 0 Nein OK Ja
>
>
> d6: Spiegel
> Untergeordneter Spiegel 1: d60
> Status: OK
> Kontrolllauf: 1
> Leseoption: roundrobin (Standard)
> Schreiboption: parallel (Standard)
> Grv_e: 12289200 Blvcke (5,9 GB)
>
> d60: Untergeordneter Spiegel von d6
> Status: OK
> Grv_e: 12289200 Blvcke (5,9 GB)
> Stripe 0:
> Gerdt Startblock Daten Status Wiede Hot-Spare
> c1t0d0s6 0 Nein OK Ja
>
>
> d1: Spiegel
> Untergeordneter Spiegel 1: d10
> Status: OK
> Kontrolllauf: 1
> Leseoption: roundrobin (Standard)
> Schreiboption: parallel (Standard)
> Grv_e: 4095000 Blvcke (2,0 GB)
>
> d10: Untergeordneter Spiegel von d1
> Status: OK
> Grv_e: 4095000 Blvcke (2,0 GB)
> Stripe 0:
> Gerdt Startblock Daten Status Wiede Hot-Spare
> c1t0d0s1 0 Nein OK Ja
>
>
> d0: Spiegel
> Untergeordneter Spiegel 1: d100
> Status: OK
> Kontrolllauf: 1
> Leseoption: roundrobin (Standard)
> Schreiboption: parallel (Standard)
> Grv_e: 6144600 Blvcke (2,9 GB)
>
> d100: Untergeordneter Spiegel von d0
> Status: OK
> Grv_e: 6144600 Blvcke (2,9 GB)
> Stripe 0:
> Gerdt Startblock Daten Status Wiede Hot-Spare
> c1t0d0s0 0 Nein OK Ja
>
>
> d71: Concat/Stripe
> Grv_e: 12902400 Blvcke (6,2 GB)
> Stripe 0:
> Gerdt Startblock Daten Wiederzuw.
> c1t1d0s7 0 Nein Ja
>
> d61: Concat/Stripe
> Grv_e: 12289200 Blvcke (5,9 GB)
> Stripe 0:
> Gerdt Startblock Daten Wiederzuw.
> c1t1d0s6 0 Nein Ja
>
> d11: Concat/Stripe
> Grv_e: 4095000 Blvcke (2,0 GB)
> Stripe 0:
> Gerdt Startblock Daten Wiederzuw.
> c1t1d0s1 0 Nein Ja
>
> d101: Concat/Stripe
> Grv_e: 6144600 Blvcke (2,9 GB)
> Stripe 0:
> Gerdt Startblock Daten Wiederzuw.
> c1t1d0s0 0 Nein Ja
>
> Device Relocation Information:
> Device Reloc Device ID
> c1t0d0 Ja id1,sd at SFUJITSU_MAG3182LC___________50002837
> c1t1d0 Ja id1,sd at SFUJITSU_MAG3182LC___________50013362
>
> d101, d11, d61, d71 are the metadetached submirrors
>>
>> # metastat -p
> # metastat -p
> d7 -m d70 1
> d70 1 1 c1t0d0s7
> d6 -m d60 1
> d60 1 1 c1t0d0s6
> d1 -m d10 1
> d10 1 1 c1t0d0s1
> d0 -m d100 1
> d100 1 1 c1t0d0s0
> d71 1 1 c1t1d0s7
> d61 1 1 c1t1d0s6
> d11 1 1 c1t1d0s1
> d101 1 1 c1t1d0s0
>>
>> # metadb -i
> # metadb -i
> flags first blk block count
> a m p luo 16 8192 /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s3
> a p luo 8208 8192 /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s3
> a p luo 16400 8192 /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s3
> a u 16 8192 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s3
> a u 8208 8192 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s3
> a u 16400 8192 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s3
>>
>> # cat /etc/vfstab
> #device device mount FS fsck
> mount mount
> #to mount to fsck point type pass at
> boot options
> #
> /proc - /proc proc - no -
> /dev/md/dsk/d1 - - swap - no -
> /dev/md/dsk/d0 /dev/md/rdsk/d0 / ufs 1 no -
> /dev/md/dsk/d6 /dev/md/rdsk/d6 /usr ufs 1 no -
> /dev/md/dsk/d7 /dev/md/rdsk/d7 /win ufs 2 yes -
> /devices - /devices devfs - no -
> ctfs - /system/contract ctfs - no -
> objfs - /system/object objfs - no -
> swap - /tmp tmpfs - yes -
>
> BTW. /win is for a SunPCiII-Card
>
> Thank in advance
>
> Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> Michael Karl wrote:
>>> Hello Andrew,
>>>
>>> Sandwich Maker schrieb:
>>>> " From: Michael Karl <mk at lexcom-net.de>
>>>> " " " This Sun is more then 8 years old (4x 360Mhz UltraII, 2GB
>>>> RAM). The " Solaris 10 has no actual recommended patch-cluster.
>>>> " What is the best und easiest way to install the patch-cluster on
>>>> the " first disk and have the option of the now working Solaris 10
>>>> on the " second metadetached mirror-disk?
>>>>
>>>> probably your best approach is to un-mirror the disks, so that you can
>>>> boot from either independently. re-mirror when you decide which one
>>>> you want to go with.
>>>>
>>> That was my first idea ... but I'm making something wrong, that the
>>> metadetached ROOT is damaged. Is in Sol10 something different to
>>> Sol8/9 ?
>>>
>>> Sorry about my simple question ... I had done this so many times
>>> years ago ... but I had an accident 2,5 years ago ... after 4
>>> operations I'm now not fit at all.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your help
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> Andrew Hay the genius nature
>>>> internet rambler is to see what all have
>>>> seen
>>>> adh at an.bradford.ma.us and think what none
>>>> thought
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
>>>> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
>>> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>> _______________________________________________
>> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
>> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
More information about the SunHELP
mailing list