Wordstar (was [rescue] FrameMaker_
Janet L. Campbell
janet at foonly.com
Wed Mar 24 12:38:35 CST 2004
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, N. Miller wrote:
> Wordstar is the reason I prefer emacs to vi. Doing ctrl+some letter(s) |
> meta+
> some letter(s) makes more sense to my hands and my brain than
> "colon+some letter meaning something+[optional slash + etc | $ ]"
>
> Funny how our original interactions with the UI of a computer or
> application
> color all that come after. Part of the reason I stick to certain apps
> now
> on the Mac and PC has to do with the divergence of UI elements. My
> favorite thing about PuTTY, for example, is that middle-click paste "just
> works" in the Windows UI.
We get used to features after a while, that's definitely true. I've had
Sun systems as my primary desktops for thirteen years now, and I've really
gotten used to some X UI features. Transparent copy and mouse click paste
are nice, but true focus follows mouse (with no autoraise) and a "front"
key top my wishlist for OSX.
I learned Wordstar early on in CP/M-land, but I ended up using vi over
emacs probably because emacs ran like frozen tar on the early-80's VAXen I
learned Unix on.
-Janet
More information about the rescue
mailing list