[rescue] Re: Ross Hypersparc

Sun Feb 9 10:23:55 CST 2003

Bill,

  You ever do the comparison.... I know this is an old thread, but
  was wondering if you did compare, and what your impressions were ?

-- Curt

>From: <wrmartin at verizon.net>
>To: The Rescue List <rescue at sunhelp.org>
>Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 23:49:00 -0500
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at out001.verizon.net 
from [192.168.129.213] at Thu, 9 Jan 2003 22:49:00 -0600
>Subject: [rescue] Re: Ross Hypersparc
>
>Having just gotten a 180, I'll be interested in this also.  Hopefully (when 
things calm down) I'll have a chance to compare it to my 150.  Should be 
interesting.
>
>Bill Martin
>> 
>> From: nick at snowman.net
>> Date: 2003/01/09 Thu PM 11:42:41 EST
>> To: "Curtis H. Wilbar Jr." <rescue at hawkmountain.net>, 
>> 	The Rescue List <rescue at sunhelp.org>
>> Subject: Re: [rescue] Re: Ross Hypersparc
>> 
>> I've never actually played with anything faster than 150mhz.. can you
>> provide details?
>> 	Thanks
>> 		Nick
>> 
>> On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote:
>> 
>> > Regarding the hypersparc post...
>> > 
>> > My experience is that the HS166/512K and HS142/1024K are better procs than
>> > the HS180 and HS200.  The half speed cache on the HS180 and HS200 incurs
>> > a performance penalty for many applications.  
>> > 
>> > Any others confirm/refute this ?
>> > 
>> > -- Curt
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
>> _______________________________________________
>> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
>_______________________________________________
>rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue