[rescue] Re: [geeks] Crap! Not again...
Joacim Melin
listor at melin.org
Sat Feb 1 14:45:25 CST 2003
Though I no nothing about space shuttles, I wonder if the airforce
would use an aircraft in active duty built 1981 ? As far as I know,
the Columbia was built around that time, but I might be wrong in both
cases.
And as far as the theories that this is a terrorist act - try taking an
aircraft down that's flying at a high altitude like the Columbia was at
a speed of 20000km/h. I don't buy it - I think this is an accident,
pure and simple. A really unfortunate one at that.
joacim
"You can tell how desperate they are by counting the number of times
they say "innovate" in their press releases."
-------------------------------
who > joacim melin
how > joacim at melin.org
where > http://z80.org
-------------------------------
On Saturday, Feb 1, 2003, at 20:44 Europe/Stockholm, Kris Kirby wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Chad Fernandez wrote:
>>> 3) Colombia is the oldest shuttle (Challenger was, until it went).
>>
>> Columbia was the first shuttle, I ever heard about. I thought the
>> Challenger was #2.
>
> Not to pick at nits, but if I remember my shuttle literature right (the
> press pack contains a flip-notebook of every mission), Enterprise came
> first, but was merely an aerodynamic model. Then Challenger, as another
> model. Finally, Columbia was build from the ground up as a shuttle, and
> Challenger was then converted into a regular shuttle.
>
> --
> Kris Kirby, KE4AHR <kris at nospam.catonic.net> TGIFreeBSD IM: 'KrisBSD'
> "BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!"
> This message brought to you by the US Department of Homeland Security
> _______________________________________________
> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
More information about the rescue
mailing list