[rescue] Re: [SunHELP] Solaris 9, First thoughts
Gregory Leblanc
gleblanc at linuxweasel.com
Sun Jan 20 12:48:07 CST 2002
On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 15:05, Joshua D Boyd wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 03:12:32PM -0500, Dave McGuire wrote:
> > On January 19, Mike Nicewonger wrote:
> > > > I still wasn't impressed. I don't really like Gnome on Linux or FreeBSD,
> > > > and I found it pretty pokey on Sol 9. It behaved well, it just felt slow
> > > > and cumbersome. ('Course I installed it on my trusty dual-CPU SPARC20,
> > > > not on a 900MHz box...)
> > >
> > > GNOME feels like mud on a fairly fast Pentium crate.
> >
> > Inexperienced programmers with C++ compilers mean HUGE, SLOW CODE.
>
> GNOME is 100% C. Well, almost. Some pieces use extensive guile, some
> extensive librep (Sawfish for instance), etc. Gnome 1.0 was reasonably
> fast. CORBA through ORBit is being use a lot more now. I don't know how
Yeah, and bonobo, which fits into CORBA and ORBs somehow, is still
undergoing massive speedups, which is desperately needs. It's not a
lightweight component model by any means.
> much this effects things. I would expect that Sawfish would be pretty slow
> since it is all interpretted lisp, but it actually seems to be one of the
> faster/better pieces.
I don't know about better, John didn't do a very good job regression
testing it, but it's certainly fast. Any crazy fools want to help port
the rep-gtk bindings to the new GTK+?
Greg
--
Portland, Oregon, USA.
More information about the rescue
mailing list