[rescue] 3 O2s

[Harri Haataja]

On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 01:52:54AM -0400, Joshua D Boyd wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 09:21:01PM -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 15, 2002, at 08:52 PM, Dan Sikorski wrote:
> > >>FYI for anyone who doesn't know, most Indigo2 configs will kick
> > >>the snot out of an O2 R5K/180.  I "upgraded" to one a few years
> > >>ago from an Indigo2 R4400/250.  The O2 was on my desk for less
> > >>than six hours, and in my posession for less than 24.

My recent posts seem to have gotten an odd From header and gotten
trapped in moderation. Delete on sight :-)

O2 has its weird sides but it does not make a fast-feeling desktop
machine. 

> If you don't plan to do video on your O2, than an r10k o2 would be
> better.

And an R10k or 12k won't be as fast as they are in other systems. They
just don't mix very well.

I think there's info in the usual place at vuurwerk.


And I still want an O2 if there's a way to get it to Finland and get
payment arranged (no credit card).

-- 
Nah, Whitesmith C was worse. It would try to anticipate your syntax errors
and correct them on the fly.
I still believe that Whitesmith C could compile the phone book.
		-- Rick Kelly on netbsd-users