[SunRescue] Your not gettin' em!

[Eric Randall]

I agree with Dan.  He could have worded it better, but it was pretty good as
stated.  Everyone likes a great deal, but a "steal" at the expense of an honest
mistake may really be a steal.  I'm astounded that people are so willingly
prepared to marshall the support of  societally sanctioned thievery in pursuit
of ...
[everyone insert what you see it as here].

Dan Lane wrote:

> *ahem* sorry about that... I was kind of in a bad mood... won't happen
> again (probably)...
>
> My point still stands, although I could have worded it a little better :)
>
> Moral of the story: if the price is too good to be true, approach with
> caution.
>
> Dan - commence flaming
>
> Dan Lane sent the following on Mon, 26 Mar 2001...
>
> > Devin L. Ganger sent the following on Mon, 26 Mar 2001...
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:52:16PM -0500, nick at snowman.net wrote:
> > >
> > > > They have the standard "We're not responsible for typos".  I am fairly
> > > > sure this clears them?
> > >
> > > Well, see, there's the little matter of the order confirmation that they
> > > sent...
> > >
> > > It's ambiguous enough that, after my phone call to the Nevada State
> > > Attorney General's office, I'm thinking that it's worth filing a
> > > complaint with the Nevada AG, my local state's AG, and the Federal Trade
> > > Commission.
> > >
> > > I urge everyone else who ordered drives under this to do so as well.
> > >
> > > I'll give "Louie Liquidator" one final email and advise him that I'm
> > > planning on doing this as my next step and seeing what he says.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rescue maillist  -  rescue at sunhelp.org
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rescue maillist  -  rescue at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue