[geeks] Wireless AP's

[Mike Ekholm]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:33:11AM -0700, Lionel Peterson wrote:
> --- vance at neurotica.com wrote:
> > Is the Cisco Aironet 350 significantly better than the Linksys WAP11,
> > Apple Airport Base Station or IBM High Rate Wireless Access Point? 
> > Why is it so much more money.
> 
> I like my WAP11 (in a residential setting), esp. aftr I added thier
> signal booster (about $80, IIRC). I used to have dead spots due in my
> house, but now everywhere is great!
 -Mike Ekholm

I too have a WAP11, and no problems.  I am thinking of moving to 802.11g
for the improved security i hear it has, but any wireless is good :-)

Its great sitting in the back yard reading slashdot.

- -- 
Mike Ekholm, UNIX Sys Admin  -  ekholm at ekholm.org
web: http://www.ekholm.org ham: kc0mpu irc: Nalez
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNIX - The Swiss army knife of software.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+9eF6iWpNXp94yboRAjdbAJ9IQentEcBc3yoXJ+5zensasH1GVgCgvQFj
9nwyyGCwZaGwPSSUgFQmsrw=
=4K1g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----