E3000 (was Re: [geeks] sigh. )

[nick at snowman.net]

Erm.. 480s do exist...... if you got 6 480s I'm going to have to start
drooling
	Nick

On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:

> So, the E3000 that I read all my email on got upgraded last night.
> 
> Here is what psrinfo -v reports:
> 
> fury% /usr/sbin/psrinfo -v
> Status of processor 6 as of: 04/18/02 13:30:33
>   Processor has been on-line since 04/18/02 00:11:04.
>   The sparcv9 processor operates at 496 MHz,
>         and has a sparcv9 floating point processor.
> Status of processor 7 as of: 04/18/02 13:30:33
>   Processor has been on-line since 04/18/02 00:11:09.
>   The sparcv9 processor operates at 496 MHz,
>         and has a sparcv9 floating point processor.
> Status of processor 10 as of: 04/18/02 13:30:33
>   Processor has been on-line since 04/18/02 00:11:09.
>   The sparcv9 processor operates at 496 MHz,
>         and has a sparcv9 floating point processor.
> Status of processor 11 as of: 04/18/02 13:30:33
>   Processor has been on-line since 04/18/02 00:11:09.
>   The sparcv9 processor operates at 496 MHz,
>         and has a sparcv9 floating point processor.
> Status of processor 14 as of: 04/18/02 13:30:33
>   Processor has been on-line since 04/18/02 00:11:09.
>   The sparcv9 processor operates at 496 MHz,
>         and has a sparcv9 floating point processor.
> 
> My understanding is that they were getting 250Mhz processors...
> Is this a mistake on psrinfo's part?  Or did maybe they find
> another donor that gave them 500Mhz processors...  (I didn't
> think those were available for the E3000s).
> 
> --Kurt
> 
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Bill Bradford wrote:
> 
> > Man, an E3K is an E3K, still.  I dont actually *own* anything bigger than
> > the sunhelp server (440Mhz USIIi).
> _______________________________________________
> GEEKS:  http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/geeks