[SunHELP] .rhosts question
Will Mc Donald
sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Thu Jun 7 08:45:29 CDT 2001
A quick google throws up...
http://www.tac.eu.org/cgi-bin/man-cgi?rhosts+5
EXAMPLES
somehost
A common usage: users on somehost may login to the local host as
the same user name.
somehost username
The user username on somehost may login to the local host. If
specified in /etc/hosts.equiv, the user may login with only the
same user name.
+ at anetgroup username
The user username may login to the local host from any machine
listed in the netgroup anetgroup.
+
+ +
Two severe security hazards. In the first case, allows a user on
any machine to login to the local host as the same user name. In
the second case, allows any user on any machine to login to the
lo-
cal host (as any user, if in /etc/hosts.equiv).
Hmm, NetBSD man pages look nice and comprehensive (compared to Red Hat),
certainly more so than linux. I've been meaning to download a BSD variant to
play with for a while. :)
----- Original Message -----
From: <william.x.ng at verizon.com>
To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:21 PM
Subject: [SunHELP] .rhosts question
>
> All,
> Does anyone know what is the difference between "+" and "+ +" on .rhosts
> file?
> Here is the issue that I have, I have two machines (A and B), same
> configuration, running NIS+ .
> machine A, user A has .rhosts with +, user B rlogin to machine A, it
works.
> machine B, user A has .rhosts with +, user B rlogin to machine A, it
> doesn't work. But if user A put "+ +", then B can do rlogin.
>
> Can someone let me know why??
> Thanks
>
> William
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
More information about the SunHELP
mailing list