[rescue] Is anyone running netalk on solaris 9 sparc?

[Dave McGuire]

On Mar 14, 2004, at 2:44 PM, Steve Sandau wrote:
> I take it that "64-bit capable" is a better descsription than plain 
> 64-bit? I assume then that it makes either 64-bit or 32-bit 
> executables. And, just because the 32-bit gcc can make a 64-bit gcc 
> doesn't mean that it can make a 64-bit anything-else, right?

   Well it doesn't matter what the compiler is running *on*...only what 
it's told to generate code for.  Heck, I frequently run GCC on an 
UltraSPARC and tell it to generate binaries for a 68K.

   I've not messed with GCC on an UltraSPARC for quite a while (I 
ditched it in codegen frustration in preference to Sun's compilers), 
but if memory serves, a GCC built for an UltraSPARC target can generate 
either 32- or 64-bit binaries.  I'm not 100% positive of this, but I 
believe that's the case.

          -Dave

--
Dave McGuire          "PC users only know two 'solutions'...
Cape Coral, FL          reboot and upgrade."    -Jonathan Patschke