[rescue] A Question about Snap Servers

[Zach Lowry]

On Jul 31, 2004, at 1:00 AM, Jonathan C. Patschke wrote:

> [jp at sentinel:/home/jp]$ top
> load averages:  0.23,  0.12,  0.09                                    
> 23:41:43
> 33 processes:  1 running, 32 idle
> CPU states:  1.4% user,  0.0% nice,  1.6% system,  0.8% interrupt,  
> 96.3% idle
> Memory: Real: 13M/28M act/tot  Free: 1028K  Swap: 61M/257M used/tot

Old Sparcs? Bah!

My 2 name servers are 3/80s.

7:26AM  up 89 days, 23:12, 1 user, load averages: 0.35, 0.20, 0.14
7:26AM  up 89 days, 22:32, 1 user, load averages: 0.61, 0.29, 0.19

They're amazing machines.

On to the topic at hand, I suppose I may have to investigate a small PC  
system, but MAN do I not want to. The Snap seemed so perfect, why did  
it have to suck?

------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
--------
Zach Lowry                                                  
http://www.netbsd.org
MTSU, Murfreesboro, TN                              Owner of 20 NetBSD  
Platforms
zach at zachlowry.net