[rescue] Kodak ColorEase PS and IRIX

[Michael Schiller]

On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 02:34 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
>   Yeah Kodak really has the whole continuous-tone thing down.  Mine is 
> a 203dpi device whose output is indistinguishable from a photograph.  
> My mom can tell the difference, but she was a photographer for many 
> years.  With only 203dpi!  This printer is on the list of things that 
> will go with me to my grave. :)

While I'm sure it's no comparison for the Kodak, I used to have a Fargo 
Primera that was also 203dpi, and when using the wax transfer ribbons 
you could tell, but when using the dye sub paper & ribbons it was darn 
near a photograph! I bought it new for $995.00 and back then (early 
90's) that was one heck of a bargain!

-Mike
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*
* PGP fingerprint= D2 4F A8 B7 13 D5 73 1E  48 99 40 99 F9 BC 74 74 *
* Email:schiller at nospam.agrijag.com \|||/    http://www.agrijag.com *
*                                   (o o)                           *
*--------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo------------------------*