[rescue] It Figures...
Steve Pacenka
sp17 at cornell.edu
Mon Jun 24 07:59:28 CDT 2002
On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 20:26, George Adkins wrote:
> Yet again, you cannot install to the disk without creating an MS-Dos
> partition space at the beginning of the disk, and suffering through the
> idiotic misery of nine-mile-long device names.
> Okay, perhaps not nine miles long, but I grow progressively more tired of
> having to hack each progressive release in order to get rid of the Stupid
> L**** style dos-compatibility partitioning scheme so that I can get back to a
> good old 'sd0[a-h]' style slice names.
> If I wanted some dumbass 'fake disk slice pointing to an MS-DOS extended
> partition table entry' I'd just install Dead-Rat or Plebian.
The fdisk included with Dead-Rat and Plebian doesn't require any
explicit DOS partitions on a drive. I've set up several Linux-only
drives on PCs. However, that Linux fdisk prevents allocating "cylinder"
zero to any partition. The "MS-DOS partition space" at the beginning of
a FreeBSD partitioned drive may just be an exposure of the zeroth
cylinder, where the partition table and after-BIOS booter reside.
Does FreeBSD require that its own partitions begin on a cylinder
boundary? To protect that first couple of sectors required by BIOS it
would have to waste the rest of what it believes to be the zeroth
cylinder.
-- SP
More information about the rescue
mailing list