[rescue] Re: Re: OH YEA??? [was: Re: Ultra?]

[George Adkins]

> > it's not the lack of SCSI, it's the presence of IDE, the lack of SMP
> > capability, and the castrated nature of the crippled Ultrasparc IIi
> > processor that make the U5 an inferior machine.
>
> George,
>
> How would you compare the SM71, say, to the U5/270 then?  Would that
> be a typical config that would be useful for comparison?
>
No comparison including an U5 could be described as "useful", you're asking 
for something similar to the "Sparc vs. Intel" contrast.

If offered a FREE U5/270, I would refuse it. (No Kidding).
If I actually had one in my posession, I would immediately give it to someone 
I didn't like, or to someone who would sell it to someone I didn't know.

George