[rescue] Re: Re: OH YEA??? [was: Re: Ultra?]

[Patrick Giagnocavo +1.717.201.3366]

On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 12:07:51PM -0400, George Adkins wrote:
> > The discussion though was on SS10 vs. U5, and the mistaken notion that
> > somehow the SCSI in the SS10 makes it a better machine than the U5 which
> > lacks SCSI.  
> it's not the lack of SCSI, it's the presence of IDE, the lack of SMP 
> capability, and the castrated nature of the crippled Ultrasparc IIi processor 
> that make the U5 an inferior machine.

George,

How would you compare the SM71, say, to the U5/270 then?  Would that
be a typical config that would be useful for comparison?

./patrick