[geeks] Solaris 9 changes

[Joshua Boyd]

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 07:38:29PM +0000, Lionel Peterson wrote:

> Anyway, it makes sense to me - it is the only possible outcome based
> on point #3 above... (Solaris 10 is 64-bit only - I assume this to be
> true, based on the conversations preceeding this) 

I understand why it would be stupid to officially support the U1.  What
I don't get is why they would put a boot time check in, rather than just
deny that it is supported.