[geeks] SPAM stats, was something about temptation and spam
Mike Meredith
mike at blackhairy.demon.co.uk
Thu Apr 22 01:26:38 CDT 2004
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:13:58 -0400, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> Wed, 21 Apr 2004 @ 13:15 -0400, Phil Stracchino said:
>
> > I've seen reports indicating they're already doing this.
>
> That's what a lot of the spam I've gotten is.
Yes. I don't look much at the origins of the spam at home, but the spam
at work has swung in the last 12 months from mostly coming from
spam-friendly ISPs (or NSPs) towards coming from everywhere. Well from
Windows machines that are presumably infected with something.
> I'm not keeping stats on my SPAM. I get around 30-100 spams per day.
>
> Here's some recent stats for me over the last few weeks (trimmed a
> bit):
For someone who doesn't keep stats on spam, your stats are very
impressive ... I must improve my own stats script :-
http://blackhairy.demon.co.uk/notes/spam-report
> Statistics from 4.8.2002 to 23.4.2004 <-- start date bogus
Are you using the Date header there ? I decided to use the date on the
last Received header as being more likely to be useful.
More information about the geeks
mailing list