[geeks] Followup on weapons seizure
Kurt Huhn
kurt at k-huhn.com
Sat Jan 18 10:43:00 CST 2003
"Chris Byrne" <chris at chrisbyrne.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Im not gonna disagree with you, but the guy was a convicted Felon
> (1992 posession of an unlicensed automatic weapon) and had
> unregistered antitank devices, explosives, antipersonell mines, anti
> aircraft launchers (unsepecified but I thought I saw an SA7 in one
> shot)and more.
>
> This guy was clearly WAY over the line.
>
Which line? The one drawn a repressive and confining government? the
guy wasn't hurting anyone. Yes he was odd - fine, but he wasn't a
'dangerous' man except in the eyes of public officials and nuetered
journalists - IMO anyway. As always, YMMV and YOMV.
It was against the law, yes. I won't argue that point. I *will* argue
that the law is too strict, ineffective, and short sighted.
--
Kurt "I remember that I've got a solid base of worms and
kurt at k-huhn.com ant eggs. I puke like a hero all night long."
-- Tony Bourdain
More information about the geeks
mailing list