[geeks] Java on Windows 2000
Jonathan C. Patschke
jp at celestrion.net
Tue Feb 11 11:01:31 CST 2003
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Kurt Huhn wrote:
> A stock install of Windows 2000 doesn't have *any* JVM installed, that I'm
> aware of. Installing the JRE on Windows is dead-fucking-simple.
> Double-click, click okay, I agree, etc, etc. Easy peasy....
Hmm. Guess I'll write it in C, then. As much as it is dead-simple to
install, I don't want to have to support $luser if anything goes wrong.
I want it to Just Work. This is really one of those guys that I want to
hand a standalone (no DLLs required) EXE file to, collect my $, and walk
away.
--
Jonathan Patschke *) "It's not about who's right and who's wrong...
Thorndale, TX (* it's about who works for the government and who
*) doesn't." --Dave McGuire
More information about the geeks
mailing list