[geeks] Re: Windows XP?

[James]

At 10:58 AM 2/7/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>At 10:47 AM 2/7/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>>Shawn Wallbridge <swallbridge at franticfilms.com> wrote:
>>
>>There's also the intangible reason - XP is "icky" for some reason.  I can't
>>quite place my finger on it, but there it is.  To me, 2000 is just the
>>addition of some multimedia support onto NT4 - an OS I actually *like*.
>
>I thought about this. I think it's smarmy. Telling it to use the old style 
>interface helps.
>_______________________________________________

Actually, unctuous might be a better description.