[geeks] Itanium 32 bit performace.... hahahaha
jdboyd at jdboyd.zill.net
jdboyd at jdboyd.zill.net
Sat Dec 20 03:25:24 CST 2003
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 09:11:51AM -0600, doctor obnox son of a bitch wrote:
> At home, my primary desktop box is a pII-266 running NetBSD-1.6.1. I've
> tried both Gnome2 and KDE3 on it. Gnome took about 2 weeks to build from
> pkgsrc (had to hand-hack the .buildlink directories for EVERYTHING!),
> and was very unsatisfactory in its handling of TrueType fonts. KDE
> built with almost no problems, looked clean and tight, but was still a
> bit too slow. I've left both of them on the box, but now I just start X
> with a single xTerm and wmx (http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/wmx/ ),
> and start up the few KDE and Gnome proggies I liked by hand. Perverse,
> I guess, but hey, it's MY box.
WMX. I haven't used that in quite a long time. It used to run like a
champ on a SS5 with some stupid, really slow 24bit card, and on a SS10
(SM100 procs) with XZ board.
In fact, I just installed in on my work desktop. Hmm. A hair sluggish
switching desktops. Livable though. This is a P4 1.4ghz piece of
trash. Low memory.
More information about the geeks
mailing list