[geeks] Swapping Sparc boxes...
Phil Stracchino
alaric at caerllewys.net
Sat Dec 20 03:25:09 CST 2003
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:05:59PM -0500, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Jonathan C. Patschke wrote:
> > > /dev/sd/c0b0t1u0p3.
>
> > I have to wonder why they did host and bus separately instead of just
> > doing channel, like Solaris does. I suppose the Linux way is more
> > correct, but it's another number to keep up with.
>
> I also wonder why the two forms insist on using DIFFERENT nomenclature.
> Is it so wrong to be somewhat consistent? Why c0 when they call it
> host0 above? Why u0 for lun0?
I think they were intentionally trying to make the nomenclature
Solaris-like in that form for the sake of people migrating from Solaris
to Linux.
--
.********* Fight Back! It may not be just YOUR life at risk. *********.
: phil stracchino : unix ronin : renaissance man : mystic zen biker geek :
: alaric at caerllewys.net : alaric-ruthven at earthlink.net : phil at latt.net :
: 2000 CBR929RR, 1991 VFR750F3 (foully murdered), 1986 VF500F (sold) :
: Linux Now! ...Because friends don't let friends use Microsoft. :
More information about the geeks
mailing list