[geeks] Speaking of Bad practice in the Win/X86 world

[phoetoid]

No....win2k is much more stable than win NT. Although, sometimes, after
like a couple hundred days, you might want to restart because of
non-micro$oft apps eating up memory or something, I've never had
problems with 2k staying up for long periods of time. 
On a side note, WTF would you want to reboot every night???? Jeez
That's terrible. I would perhaps find a different OS to use for your
servers then....

 
[ Charlie Richards - phoetoid at pyrospheric.net ]   
..::[ www.pyrospheric.net ]::....::[ www.bsdvault.net ]::..
 

-----Original Message-----
From: geeks-bounces at sunhelp.org [mailto:geeks-bounces at sunhelp.org] On
Behalf Of James
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 9:21 AM
To: The Geeks List
Subject: RE: [geeks] Speaking of Bad practice in the Win/X86 world

> -----Original Message-----
> Behalf Of Andrew Weiss
>
> "Reboot Schedule
> Periodic server reboots can be scheduled using the Reboot Schedule tab
> for each server.  It is a good practice to reboot servers on a regular
> basis.  The reason for this is that applications housed on the server
> can cause memory leaks that tie up valuable resources on your servers.

This is the first time I've seen this in print. Seen it a lot in
practice.
Is this true of win2k also? Or is this just an NT thing?