[SunHELP] Re.Unix group limitation?

VLava Kumar vlkumar at hns.com
Thu Jan 24 13:11:53 CST 2002


Hi,
         Can any one tell how many userids can a group  hold ?  is it possible to increase
limitations ?
Thanks ,
Lava
sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org wrote:

> Send SunHELP mailing list submissions to
>         sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SunHELP digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. unsubscribe (Cao.External at infineon.com)
>    2. SUN CERTIFIED SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE SOLARIS[tm] 8
>        OPERATIN G ENVIRONMENT UPGRADE EXAM (OFrayman)
>    3. Ancient UNIX licenses! (Bill Bradford)
>    4. RE: SUN CERTIFIED SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE
>        SOLARIS[ tm] 8 OPERATIN G ENVIRONMENT UPGRADE EXAM (Sangbutsarakum, Patai)
>    5. Re: C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite (Dennis Murphy)
>    6. Newbie question about GCC (johnlee)
>    7. ide harddisk on ultra10 (Martin Walter)
>    8. Changing passwords through remote SSH command??? (Robert Banniza)
>    9. Re: Changing passwords through remote SSH command??? (Dale Ghent)
>   10. RE: ide harddisk on ultra10 (Peter Stokes)
>   11. Re: ide harddisk on ultra10 (s at avoidant.org)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: Cao.External at infineon.com
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 20:05:25 +0100
> Subject: [SunHELP] unsubscribe
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org [mailto:sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:01 PM
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Subject: SunHELP digest, Vol 1 #1485 - 12 msgs
>
> Send SunHELP mailing list submissions to
>         sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SunHELP digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Help needed (Dale Ghent)
>    2. Fw: Re: (timuel)
>    3. Re: Fw: Re: (Will Yardley)
>    4. Re: Fw: Re: (Kurt Huhn)
>    5. C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite (Bill Bradford)
>    6. secure RPC problem (Mahadi Yusof)
>    7. RE: C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite (Kirkby, David)
>    8. RE: C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite (Kirkby, David)
>    9. Unix group limitation? (Meng, Andrew)
>   10. Re: Unix group limitation? (Jarrett Carver)
>   11. Re: Unix group limitation? (Dale Ghent)
>   12. RE: Unix group limitation? (Ravi_Thotapalli at csaa.com)
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:00:37 -0500 (EST)
> From: Dale Ghent <daleg at elemental.org>
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Help needed
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Rajesh Vadde wrote:
>
> | Hi All,
> | Does anybody is having any comparision chart between Sun IP Multi pathing
> | and Sun Trunking.?
> |
> | I want to get the differences between these two and also what are the
> | advantages of each one as compared to other.
>
> I havnt seen any chart that specifically compares the two, but you can
> probably come up with one by reading the overviews in the documentation
> for each:
>
> for IP Multipathing:
>
> http://docs.sun.com/ab2/coll.780.2/IPNETMPADMIN/@Ab2TocView?Ab2Lang=C&Ab2Enc=iso-8859-1
>
> for Sun Trunking:
>
> ftp://192.18.99.138/806-4207-10/806-4207-10.pdf
>
> /dale
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: "timuel" <timuel-sunlist at voicenet.com>
> To: <tech at openbsd.org>, <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:40:15 -0500
> Subject: [SunHELP] Fw: Re:
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> Thanks for the "info.DOC.scr" and the "ATT00721.txt" attached to the below
> email! I`ve been waiting for them my entire life!
>
> @$$hole.
>
> Anyone else get this or is this or am I the only one? These lists are the only
> two places I use this address... watch out i guess.
>
> http://vil.mcafee.com/dispVirus.asp?virus_k=99069&
>
> --
> timuel
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Return-Path: <raidpingu at snoopsworld.de>
> Delivered-To: timuel-sunlist at voicenet.com
> Received: (qmail 28462 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2002 20:29:39 -0000
> Received: from natpost.webmailer.de (HELO post.webmailer.de) (192.67.198.65)
>   by mail11.voicenet.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2002 20:29:39 -0000
> Received: from aol.com (pD9032F63.dip.t-dialin.net [217.3.47.99])
>  by post.webmailer.de (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA01398
>  for <timuel-sunlist at voicenet.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:29:31 +0100 (MET)
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:29:31 +0100 (MET)
> Message-Id: <200201222029.VAA01398 at post.webmailer.de>
> From: "raidpingu" <_raidpingu at snoopsworld.de>
> To: timuel-sunlist at voicenet.com
> Subject: Re:
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/related;
>   type="multipart/alternative";
>   boundary="====_ABC1234567890DEF_===="
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Unsent: 1
> From: raidpingu
> To: timuel-sunlist at voicenet.com
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:29 PM
> Subject: Re:
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:48:14 -0800
> From: Will Yardley <william+sun at hq.newdream.net>
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Organization: New Dream Network
> Subject: [SunHELP] Re: Fw: Re:
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> timuel wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the "info.DOC.scr" and the "ATT00721.txt" attached to the
> > below email! I`ve been waiting for them my entire life!
> >
> > @$$hole.
>
> perhaps (s)he was just sending you those files to have your advice?
> :>
>
> of course if you use a different email client than OE you're less likely
> to be affected by stuff like this (even though it's annoying already).
>
> realistically, while it's annoying that some people get viruses and pass
> them along, namecalling isn't really going to get you far.  trying to
> explain what's going on to the person whose computer is infected is
> probably going to be more effective in the long run.
>
> w
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: "Kurt Huhn" <kurt at k-huhn.com>
> To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Fw: Re:
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:28:19 -0500
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> > Anyone else get this or is this or am I the only one? These lists are the
> only
> > two places I use this address... watch out i guess.
> >
>
> errr...whut?
>
> I suppose you have virus protection software?  If not, it's probably your
> own fault if you got infected.  Personal responsibility...
>
> At the very minimum, complaining to two whole lists isn't going to get you
> anywhere.  How about tracking down the original sender and letting him know
> he has a virus?
>
> And yes, you're the only one...
>
> Kurt
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:49:52 -0600
> From: Bill Bradford <mrbill at mrbill.net>
> To: sunhelp at mrbill.net
> Subject: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> Anybody know about a Creator 3D series3 versus an Expert3D-Lite, in
> terms of desktop (2D, 24bit) performance?
>
> Bill
>
> --
> Bill Bradford
> mrbill at mrbill.net
> Austin, TX
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 6
> From: "Mahadi Yusof" <mahadi at cs.usm.my>
> To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:32:33 +0800
> Subject: [SunHELP] secure RPC problem
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> Hi all,
> One of the user says he cannot login to the system. It says 'user needs
> secure RPC to log in, but none available'.
> What is the problem is?
>
> -------------------------------------
> Mahadi Yusof
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 7
> From: "Kirkby, David" <David.Kirkby at marconi.com>
> To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Subject: RE: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:49:12 -0000
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> I asked exactly the same question the other day on comp.sys.sun.admin.
> Although the Elite3D is the more expensive framebuffer, the Creator3D does
> have some advantages. For instance, the resolution of the Elite is lower -
> see
> http://www.sun.com/desktop/products/graphics/expert3d/expert3djtf.html
> Someone pointed out there are some benchmarks on Sun's website
> http://www.sun.com/desktop/products/Graphics/graphicsbenchmks.pdf
> You will notice the Elite3D wins most of them, but I think the one it looses
> (Xmark93) is 2D.
>
> The framebuffer FAQ at
> http://www.sunhelp.org/faq/FrameBuffer.html
> says "The problem is that as with the ZX, the Elite is geared towards
> high-end applications. It's not a frame buffer for the casual user; in most
> cases I would prefer the Creator 3D running at 1600x1200 in 24 bit mode."
>
> I'm in the position of having an Ultra 60 and an Ultra 30. The U30 will be
> sold and the U60 kept, but I don't know what framebuffer to sell. Having
> tried the two for 3D use, I can detect no difference. Both are very fast on
> my U60 and my monitor does not allow above 1280x1024. I think I'll keep the
> Elite3D-m3, since I might get a 3D application that can make more use of it,
> but are not sure.
>
> If anyone else has some comments, I'd like to know of them.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Bradford [mailto:mrbill at mrbill.net]
> Sent: 22 January 2002 23:50
> To: sunhelp at mrbill.net
> Subject: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
>
> Anybody know about a Creator 3D series3 versus an Expert3D-Lite, in
> terms of desktop (2D, 24bit) performance?
>
> Bill
>
> --
> Bill Bradford
> mrbill at mrbill.net
> Austin, TX
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist  -  SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 8
> From: "Kirkby, David" <David.Kirkby at marconi.com>
> To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Subject: RE: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:07:20 -0000
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> I said in the last email I compared the two framebuffers for *3D* use and
> found no difference. I did not mean to say that !!!
> I meant to say I compared them in *2D* applications, and found no
> perceptible difference. Both seem 'instant' to my brain (perhaps my brain
> has just slowed). I've not personally compared them in 3D use.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kirkby, David [mailto:David.Kirkby at marconi.com]
> Sent: 23 January 2002 10:49
> To: 'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'
> Subject: RE: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
>
> I asked exactly the same question the other day on comp.sys.sun.admin.
> Although the Elite3D is the more expensive framebuffer, the Creator3D does
> have some advantages. For instance, the resolution of the Elite is lower -
> see
> http://www.sun.com/desktop/products/graphics/expert3d/expert3djtf.html
> Someone pointed out there are some benchmarks on Sun's website
> http://www.sun.com/desktop/products/Graphics/graphicsbenchmks.pdf
> You will notice the Elite3D wins most of them, but I think the one it looses
> (Xmark93) is 2D.
>
> The framebuffer FAQ at
> http://www.sunhelp.org/faq/FrameBuffer.html
> says "The problem is that as with the ZX, the Elite is geared towards
> high-end applications. It's not a frame buffer for the casual user; in most
> cases I would prefer the Creator 3D running at 1600x1200 in 24 bit mode."
>
> I'm in the position of having an Ultra 60 and an Ultra 30. The U30 will be
> sold and the U60 kept, but I don't know what framebuffer to sell. Having
> tried the two for 3D use, I can detect no difference. Both are very fast on
> my U60 and my monitor does not allow above 1280x1024. I think I'll keep the
> Elite3D-m3, since I might get a 3D application that can make more use of it,
> but are not sure.
>
> If anyone else has some comments, I'd like to know of them.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Bradford [mailto:mrbill at mrbill.net]
> Sent: 22 January 2002 23:50
> To: sunhelp at mrbill.net
> Subject: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
>
> Anybody know about a Creator 3D series3 versus an Expert3D-Lite, in
> terms of desktop (2D, 24bit) performance?
>
> Bill
>
> --
> Bill Bradford
> mrbill at mrbill.net
> Austin, TX
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist  -  SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist  -  SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 9
> From: "Meng, Andrew" <Andrew.Meng at capitalone.com>
> To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:51:10 -0500
> Subject: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> Hello,
>
> How many groups can a Unix id be in on Solaris, any limitation on Solaris or
> other flavors of Unix? Thanks!
>
> Andrew
>
> **************************************************************************
> The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only
> for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other
> use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 10
> From: "Jarrett Carver" <solarboyz1 at hotmail.com>
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:06:10
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> >From man group(4)
>
> If a user is in more groups than the system is configured for,
> {NGROUPS_MAX}, a warning  will be   given  and  subsequent  group
> specifications  will  be ignored.
>
> To find NGROUPS_MAX
>
> # echo ngroups_max/D | adb -k /dev/ksyms /dev/mem
> physmem 79f0
> ngroups_max:
> ngroups_max:    16
>
> #
>
> >From: "Meng, Andrew" <Andrew.Meng at capitalone.com>
> >Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> >Subject: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
> >Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:51:10 -0500
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >How many groups can a Unix id be in on Solaris, any limitation on Solaris
> >or
> >other flavors of Unix? Thanks!
> >
> >Andrew
> >
> >**************************************************************************
> >The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only
> >for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader
> >of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> >any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other
> >use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is
> >strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> >please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
> >_______________________________________________
> >SunHELP maillist  -  SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> >http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
> Jarrett Carver          http://www.geocities.com/solarboyz1
> solarboyz1 at hotmail.com   Unix/NT Systems Administrator
> ___________________________________________________________
> "When people sigh 'Life is hard', I am always tempted to
> ask 'compared to what?'".
>                - Sydney Harris
> ____________________________________________________________
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:07:45 -0500 (EST)
> From: Dale Ghent <daleg at elemental.org>
> To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Meng, Andrew wrote:
>
> | Hello,
> |
> | How many groups can a Unix id be in on Solaris, any limitation on Solaris or
> | other flavors of Unix? Thanks!
>
> man -s4 group
>
> /dale
>
> -- __--__--
>
> Message: 12
> From: Ravi_Thotapalli at csaa.com
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Subject: RE: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 08:11:37 -0800
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> I guess its 16 (first group the primary and the rest of 15 secondary groups)
> hope this helps...
>
> ravi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meng, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Meng at capitalone.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 7:51 AM
> To: 'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'
> Subject: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
>
> Hello,
>
> How many groups can a Unix id be in on Solaris, any limitation on Solaris or
> other flavors of Unix? Thanks!
>
> Andrew
>
> **************************************************************************
> The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only
> for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other
> use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist  -  SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
> -- __--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist  -  SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
> End of SunHELP Digest
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: OFrayman <OFrayman at VerticalAlliance.com>
> To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:30:31 -0500
> Subject: [SunHELP] SUN CERTIFIED SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE SOLARIS[tm] 8
>  OPERATIN G ENVIRONMENT UPGRADE EXAM
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> Does anybody have related material for this exam.  I just finished Solaris 7
> Certification and want to upgrade to 8 before Jan 31st
> Your help will be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Oleg Frayman
> 190 W. Germantown Pike, Suite 210
> Norristown , PA. 19401-1385
> Phone: 610-278-1838 x147  Fax 610-278-6638
> mailto:ofrayman at verticalalliance.com
> "Customer Interaction & Ticketing Solutions
> for the Sports, Media & Entertainment Industries"
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:16:42 -0600
> From: Bill Bradford <mrbill at mrbill.net>
> To: geeks at mrbill.net, rescue at mrbill.net, sunhelp at mrbill.net
> Subject: [SunHELP] Ancient UNIX licenses!
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> This *really* kicks ass:
>
> http://www.sunhelp.org/ancient-source.pdf
>
> Bill
>
> --
> Bill Bradford
> mrbill at mrbill.net
> Austin, TX
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: "Sangbutsarakum, Patai" <patais at reach.com>
> To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Subject: RE: [SunHELP] SUN CERTIFIED SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE
>   SOLARIS[ tm] 8 OPERATIN G ENVIRONMENT UPGRADE EXAM
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:43:48 +0700
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> I'm preparing for Solaris 7 Part II,
> Could u please point me the exam guide that
> ask in the same way as real exam?
>
> Thanks in advances
> Patrick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OFrayman [mailto:OFrayman at VerticalAlliance.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 06:31
> To: 'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'
> Subject: [SunHELP] SUN CERTIFIED SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE SOLARIS[tm] 8
> OPERATIN G ENVIRONMENT UPGRADE EXAM
>
> Does anybody have related material for this exam.  I just finished Solaris 7
> Certification and want to upgrade to 8 before Jan 31st
> Your help will be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Oleg Frayman
> 190 W. Germantown Pike, Suite 210
> Norristown , PA. 19401-1385
> Phone: 610-278-1838 x147  Fax 610-278-6638
> mailto:ofrayman at verticalalliance.com
> "Customer Interaction & Ticketing Solutions
> for the Sports, Media & Entertainment Industries"
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist  -  SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:15:43 -0500
> Subject: Re: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
> From: Dennis Murphy <dmurphy at osxadm.com>
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> > Anybody know about a Creator 3D series3 versus an Expert3D-Lite, in
> > terms of desktop (2D, 24bit) performance?
>
>         By the Expert3D-Lite, I assume you mean that "thing" that ships in
> the Blade 100.
>
> Rough estimates (nothing official, just my own observation) says that
> the 2D performance is almost the same.   As long as you're not using any
> 3d-spinning-wingdings rendered in OpenGL, it's barely noticeable.
>
> The C3D is an _excellent_ card, but expensive.  If you don't need to do
> any sim modeling, the E3D Lite is a good choice.
>
> Personally, I have a C3Ds3 in my Ultra 60, just 'cuz it's UPA and not
> PCI.  I want to use that UPA slot for _something_! :-)
>
> If you can point me in the direction of some benchmarks, I'd be more
> than happy to run them against both cards....
>
> --DM
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> From: "johnlee" <johnlee at sc23.sc.mcel.mot.com>
> To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:11:40 +0800
> Subject: [SunHELP] Newbie question about GCC
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> Greetings,
>
> I am a beginner with the GCC. I used my gcc2.95.2 on my Solaris7 workstation
> to compile a GNU source package(Gcc2.95.3) and got the following errors:
> -----------------------------------------
> Undefined  symbol                      first referenced in file
> sfsync                              makeinfo.o
> sfvsprintf                          makeinfo.o
> _stdfprintf                         makeinfo.o
> sfstdout                            makeinfo.o
> sfsscanf                            makeinfo.o
> sfclose                             makeinfo.o
> sfvprintf                           makeinfo.o
> _sfflsbuf                           makeinfo.o
> _stdfopen                           makeinfo.o
> _stdsprintf                         makeinfo.o
> sfstderr                            makeinfo.o
> _stdprintf                          makeinfo.o
> sfpurge                             makeinfo.o
> _stdfread                           makeinfo.o
> _stdfwrite                          makeinfo.o
> _sffilbuf                           makeinfo.o
> sfstdin                             makeinfo.o
> sfseek                              makeinfo.o
> ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to makeinfo
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> *** Error code 1
> make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `makeinfo'
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Seems it is a library problem But I don't know how to deal with it. Can
> anybody point me on this ? Thanks very much.
>
> Best Regards
> John
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> From: "Martin Walter" <solaris at fue-gmbh.com>
> To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:19:07 +0100
> Subject: [SunHELP] ide harddisk on ultra10
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> Hi all,
>
> i wanted to format a IBM IC35L040AVER07-0 harddisk (40GB ATA 100) in an Sun
> Ultra 10 workstation.
> With the format tool of Solaris 2.7 the disk is recognized as IC35L040AVER07-0
> with 6,85GB.
>
> Then i formated it on a pc with Partition Magic.
> On pc there are 39 GB.
>
> Can anyone help me to get the remaining 33 GB?
>
> Thanks for help
> Martin Walter
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:49:23 -0600
> From: "Robert Banniza" <RPBanniz at ascensionhealth.org>
> To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Subject: [SunHELP] Changing passwords through remote SSH command???
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> I'm authenticating off of keys using SSH. I want to change my password
> on a machine remotely by saying 'ssh robert at server "passwd robert"' but
> I never get prompted for password change information. Rather, my prompt
> comes back to me as though nothing happened. How can I do this remotely
> without using an expect script?
>
> Thanks
> Robert
>
> Robert Banniza
> Senior UNIX Administrator
> Ascension Health
> Phone: 812-228-2157
>
> NOTE: This e-mail message may contain information that may be privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure.  It is intended for use only by
> the person to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message in
> error, please do not forward or use this information in any way, delete it
> immediately, and contact the sender as soon as possible by the reply option
> or by telephone at the telephone number listed (if available).  Thank you.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:14:17 -0500 (EST)
> From: Dale Ghent <daleg at elemental.org>
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Changing passwords through remote SSH command???
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Robert Banniza wrote:
>
> | I'm authenticating off of keys using SSH. I want to change my password
> | on a machine remotely by saying 'ssh robert at server "passwd robert"' but
> | I never get prompted for password change information. Rather, my prompt
> | comes back to me as though nothing happened. How can I do this remotely
> | without using an expect script?
>
> try:
>
>   ssh -t robert at server 'passwd robert'
>
> /dale
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> From: "Peter Stokes" <peter at ashlyn.co.uk>
> To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> Subject: RE: [SunHELP] ide harddisk on ultra10
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:16:09 -0000
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> Hi
>
> You will probably need to upgrade to Sol 8.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org [mailto:sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org]On
> Behalf Of Martin Walter
> Sent: 24 January 2002 15:19
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Subject: [SunHELP] ide harddisk on ultra10
>
> Hi all,
>
> i wanted to format a IBM IC35L040AVER07-0 harddisk (40GB ATA 100) in an Sun
> Ultra 10 workstation.
> With the format tool of Solaris 2.7 the disk is recognized as
> IC35L040AVER07-0
> with 6,85GB.
>
> Then i formated it on a pc with Partition Magic.
> On pc there are 39 GB.
>
> Can anyone help me to get the remaining 33 GB?
>
> Thanks for help
> Martin Walter
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist  -  SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:29:45 -0500
> From: s at avoidant.org
> Organization: Robots from Mars
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Subject: Re: [SunHELP] ide harddisk on ultra10
> Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>
> Martin Walter wrote:
>
> > Can anyone help me to get the remaining 33 GB?
>
> Yeah, upgrade to Sol8. As far as I recall, 7 doesn't do big IDE drives.
>
> ---sambo
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist  -  SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
> End of SunHELP Digest

--
----------------------------------------------------------
Lava Pandurangam

100 Lake Forest Boulevard
Gaithersburg, MD 20877            E-mail: vlkumar at hns.com
----------------------------------------------------------



More information about the SunHELP mailing list