[SunHELP] RE: SunHELP digest, Vol 1 #928 - 17 msgs
Pissey, Vinod
sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Mon Apr 2 11:37:01 CDT 2001
Hi Triyono
You can use the following command to find out the status of your network
card'
ndd -get /dev/hme link_speed -----> will give you the speed of the network
card.
ndd -get /dev/hme link_status -----> will give you the status whether up or
down.
ndd -get /dev/hme link_mode -------> will tell you whether it is half duplex
or full duplex.
You can use the set command to set the network card to whatever you need.
Thanks
Regards
Vinod
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 11:53:27 +0700
From: "Triyono" <triyono at RTMGlobal.com>
Organization: PT. RTMGlobal Integrasi
To: sunhelp <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: [SunHELP] HME the speed and duplex
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------47B65AC50B69599DD006954F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi All,
I have NIC 10/100 Mb/s. Ho do I know in Solaris that I got full or half
duplex and 10 or 100 Mb/s.
Thanks
-triyono-
-----Original Message-----
From: sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org [mailto:sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:03 AM
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: SunHELP digest, Vol 1 #928 - 17 msgs
Send SunHELP mailing list submissions to
sunhelp at sunhelp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SunHELP digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. RE: How to make a bootable floppy in Solaris 2.7 (Foong, Tzeweng)
2. post sequence (tom alter)
3. HME the speed and duplex (Triyono)
4. Re: HME the speed and duplex (Kevin Stevens)
5. Re: HME the speed and duplex (Chanaka Mendis)
6. Re: Sun Frame Relay (Harry Candra Wibowo)
7. Re: Sun Frame Relay (Carl-Johan Schenstrom)
8. Re: PROBLEM WITH MULTIPLE ADDRESS PER INTERFACE (david)
9. RE: re: cpu problems (Fletcher, Joe)
10. "df -k" & "du -ds /" difference (bakis)
11. Re: "df -k" & "du -ds /" difference (Kevin Stevens)
12. SCSI-Error? "Variable record length I/O" (Ballweg, Christian)
13. Installing LS command (souleymane kante)
14. RE: Installing LS command (Fletcher, Joe)
15. problem with cron (david)
16. Re: Installing LS command (souleymane kante)
17. RE: Installing LS command (Suhas Kamble)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: "Foong, Tzeweng" <Tzeweng.Foong at team.telstra.com>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: RE: [SunHELP] How to make a bootable floppy in Solaris 2.7
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:52:41 +1000
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Hi,
Do you mean for sparc or for the intel platform?
TW
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NAVIN NINAN [SMTP:navinninan at usa.net]
> Sent: Sunday, 1 April 2001 21:59
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Subject: [SunHELP] How to make a bootable floppy in Solaris 2.7
>
> hi i am Navin.
>
> I want to make bootable installation floppy for Solaris 2.7
> Please help me
>
> Thanking in Advance
>
> Navin Ninan
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
--__--__--
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 22:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: tom alter <alti_tom at yahoo.com>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: [SunHELP] post sequence
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
hi everyone,
i would like to know the sequence of operations that
would take place right from the power-on on solaris
enterprise machines, including the post sequence. also
the various LED indications. hope somebody could help
me out in this. anybody know any url regarding these
details.
Regards
tom
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text
--__--__--
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 11:53:27 +0700
From: "Triyono" <triyono at RTMGlobal.com>
Organization: PT. RTMGlobal Integrasi
To: sunhelp <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: [SunHELP] HME the speed and duplex
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------47B65AC50B69599DD006954F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi All,
I have NIC 10/100 Mb/s. Ho do I know in Solaris that I got full or half
duplex and 10 or 100 Mb/s.
Thanks
-triyono-
--------------47B65AC50B69599DD006954F
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="triyono.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for triyono
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="triyono.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:;triyono
tel;work:PT RTM Global Integration
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.RTMGlobal.com
adr:;;Menara DEA 10th floor Mega Kuningan;Jakarta;DKI
Jakarta;12950;Indonesia
version:2.1
email;internet:triyono at RTMGlobal.com
title:System Engineer
fn:triyono
end:vcard
--------------47B65AC50B69599DD006954F--
--__--__--
Message: 4
From: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens at Bigfoot.com>
To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] HME the speed and duplex
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 23:09:30 -0700
Organization: Sporadic
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Use the ndd utility (can also set parameters). Wade through man ndd; it
does
a lot of other things you may find useful as well.
KeS
----- Original Message -----
From: "Triyono" <triyono at RTMGlobal.com>
To: "sunhelp" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 21:53
Subject: [SunHELP] HME the speed and duplex
> Hi All,
> I have NIC 10/100 Mb/s. Ho do I know in Solaris that I got full or half
> duplex and 10 or 100 Mb/s.
>
> Thanks
>
> -triyono-
>
--__--__--
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 00:32:12 +0600
From: Chanaka Mendis <chanakam at MillenniumIT.COM>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] HME the speed and duplex
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Triyono wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have NIC 10/100 Mb/s. Ho do I know in Solaris that I got full or half
> duplex and 10 or 100 Mb/s.
>
> Thanks
>
> -triyono-
Use
ndd -get /dev/hme link_speed
/Gayantha
--__--__--
Message: 6
From: "Harry Candra Wibowo" <harry.wibowo at rtm.co.id>
To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Sun Frame Relay
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:41:09 +0700
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
dear all
i need help ...
how to change setting 64bit kernel to 32bit kernel in solaris 7, without
re-install
'cause Solstice Frame Relay is not running in Solaris 7 64bit kernel,
thanks in advance
H. Candra Wibowo
----- Original Message -----
From: Dale Ghent <daleg at elemental.org>
To: sunhelp <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Sun Frame Relay
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Hamdi Mulya wrote:
>
> | Dear all,
> |
> | I need help...
> | When I Installing Frame Relay 2.0.1 on solaris 2.7, there is warning
message
> | :
> |
> | devfsadm: driver failed to attach: fr
> | Warning: Driver (fr) successfully added to system but failed to attach
> |
> | It is Running well on solaris 2.6.
> |
> | Does anyone have experiance to solve this problem...?
>
> It does not appear that Frame Relay 2.0.1 supports 64bit kernels, which is
> what you're probably running on your e250/sol7.
>
> You could boot your e250 with a 32bit kernel instead, but I do not know if
> the 32bit fr driver supports the Solaris 7 kernel. There's no patch for
> Frame Relay that pertains to Solaris 7.
>
> /dale
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
>
--__--__--
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:29:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carl-Johan Schenstrom <cjs at bluebox.pp.se>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Sun Frame Relay
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Harry Candra Wibowo wrote:
> i need help ...
> how to change setting 64bit kernel to 32bit kernel in solaris 7,
without
> re-install
> 'cause Solstice Frame Relay is not running in Solaris 7 64bit kernel,
Set boot-file in the EEPROM to "kernel/unix" by running the following
command as root and then reboot:
eeprom 'boot-file=kernel/unix'
//cjs
--__--__--
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 08:25:32 +0000
From: david <dcg at seric.es>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] PROBLEM WITH MULTIPLE ADDRESS PER INTERFACE
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Hi
i've checked /etc/hosts and i've forgotten put the name into ..., i've
reboot
the machine an then all has gone ok
Thanks a lot !!
Tom Jones wrote:
Have you checked the spelling of Scratch in your /etc/hosts file?
> (assuming you've made an entry in hosts for a hostname of
> Scratch with the IP address of 192.168.0.36)
>
> It appears that the IP address isn't obtainable from your hosts file which
> is why you get all zeroes for the IP address in ifconfig output.
>
--__--__--
Message: 9
From: "Fletcher, Joe" <joe.fletcher at Metapack.com>
To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: RE: [SunHELP] re: cpu problems
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:26:29 +0100
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Err, fraid it's not reassuring if you've got all the current patches in. All
the aggregate
patch kits contain the "fix" for the ecache problem. In effect SUN took a
shortcut when designing the UII and didn't use ECC on the cache memory. The
result is you can get uncorrected cache errors and the thing baarfs. The fix
is a cache scrubbing mechanism which does a sort of cleanup to try to reduce
the error rates. If you have all the patches on and it's still crashing with
ecache errors then you I'm afraid you may have another problem. Based on my
recent experiences and what to me is a significant group of other users at
other sites the Ultra II is a seriously ropey bit of kit. I've just had both
CPUs and a motherboard swapped out in an E420R with another machine due to
get it's chips swapped as soon as I can get it scheduled. I have 9 other
confirmed sites who have experienced the same symptoms as me on their
E220/420 hardware with anecdotal indications of several more.
Right now I wish we'd bought Compaq DS20s instead.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Wallace [mailto:andreww51 at totalise.co.uk]
Sent: 30 March 2001 18:33
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: [SunHELP] re: cpu problems
Thanks Joe that's kind of reassuring ... I think.
We've got all recommended patches installed.
Is there a specific patch we need?
What are the workarounds you mention?
Andrew
Totalise - the Users ISP
----------------------
To become a member and a shareholder
visit http//www.totalise.net/go.htm?ref=andreww51
-----------------------
The Totalise Email system, probably the most flexible email system in the
world. To register for an account goto http:/www.totalise.net
_______________________________________________
SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
MetaPack
The Lightwell
12/16 Laystall Street
Clerkenwell
London EC1R 4PF
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7843 6720
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7843 6721
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email is confidential and proprietary;
all information contained in it must be used only by the addressee in
accordance with MetaPack's terms of business and non-disclosure agreement.
Disclosure, copying, and distribution to, or use by, anyone other than the
intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
--__--__--
Message: 10
From: "bakis" <sahinbaki at hotmail.com>
To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:35:48 +0300
Subject: [SunHELP] "df -k" & "du -ds /" difference
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0148_01C0BB69.108C6350
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-9"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all=20
Today we have faced a starange thing. There is a controversy between "df =
-k" and "du -ds /"=20
When we look the "/" usage by=20
"df -k" it is below
# df -k=20
Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on=20
/dev/md/dsk/d0 4860130 4512480 299049 94% /=20
but we use "du -ds /" it give following=20
# du -ds /=20
2535030=20
There is a great difference btw 4512480 and 2535030. We couldn't =
understand the reason for this.
Do you have any idea?
Thanks=20
------=_NextPart_000_0148_01C0BB69.108C6350
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-9"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-9">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi all </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Today we have faced a starange thing. =
There is a=20
controversy between "df -k" and "du -ds /" </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>When</FONT> <FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>we look=20
the "/" usage by </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>"df -k" it is below</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>
<P># df -k </P>
<P>Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on </P>
<P>/dev/md/dsk/d0 4860130 4512480 299049 94% / </P>
<P>but we use <FONT face=3DArial>"du -ds /" it give following=20
</FONT></P><FONT size=3D2>
<P># du -ds / </P>
<P>2535030 </P>
<P><FONT face=3DArial>There is a great difference btw </FONT><FONT =
face=3D"Times New Roman">4512480 and 2535030. We couldn't understand the =
reason=20
for this.</FONT></P>
<P>Do you have any idea?</P>
<P>Thanks </P>
<P><FONT =
face=3DArial></FONT> </P></FONT></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0148_01C0BB69.108C6350--
--__--__--
Message: 11
From: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens at Bigfoot.com>
To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] "df -k" & "du -ds /" difference
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 01:47:35 -0700
Organization: Sporadic
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Well, you asked for the "df" info in 1024 byte blocks, and the "du" info in
512 byte blocks, for one thing...
But that still takes you in the wrong direction.
Did the id you ran "du" under have permissions all the way down the
directory
tree?
KeS
----- Original Message -----
From: "bakis" <sahinbaki at hotmail.com>
To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 01:35
Subject: [SunHELP] "df -k" & "du -ds /" difference
Hi all
Today we have faced a starange thing. There is a controversy between "df -k"
and "du -ds /"
When we look the "/" usage by
"df -k" it is below
# df -k
Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/md/dsk/d0 4860130 4512480 299049 94% /
but we use "du -ds /" it give following
# du -ds /
2535030
There is a great difference btw 4512480 and 2535030. We couldn't understand
the reason for this.
Do you have any idea?
Thanks
--__--__--
Message: 12
From: "Ballweg, Christian" <cballweg at wilma.de>
To: "'SunHELP'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:59:53 +0200
Subject: [SunHELP] SCSI-Error? "Variable record length I/O"
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Hi all!
Hoping to find someone who can help me figuring this out i send this again:
I found this Message in /var/adm/messages after doing a backup with my new
DLT:
Mar 27 13:38:34 snerd scsi: [ID 365881 kern.info]
/pci at 1f,2000/scsi at 1/st at 5,0(st19):
Mar 27 13:38:34 snerd <Vendor 'TANDBERG' Product 'DLT8000 '>
Mar 27 13:38:34 snerd scsi: [ID 193665 kern.info] st19 at glm20: target 5
lun 0
Mar 27 13:38:34 snerd genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] st19 is
/pci at 1f,2000/scsi at 1/st at 5,0
Mar 27 13:38:56 snerd scsi: [ID 107833 kern.notice]
/pci at 1f,2000/scsi at 1/st at 5,0 (st19):
Mar 27 13:38:56 snerd Variable record length I/O
Is this an error / sth. to worry about?
I really don't have a clue - simply unable to find sth. in my docs and
through SunSolve.
TIA
Chris
--__--__--
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 09:59:00 +0000
From: souleymane kante <kante at globeaccess.net>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org, list at inet-access.net
Subject: [SunHELP] Installing LS command
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Hi
My problem with LS command is not solved. Only root can see files and
directories contents with the LS command.
I want install a new LS command from the solaris software CDROM. Is it
possible ?
Could this solve the problem ?
I have solaris 2.5.1. The LS command is attached to the directory
/s0/Solaris_2.5.1/SUNWcsu on the solaris 2.5.1 CDROM.
How to install it ?
regards,
Souleymane
--__--__--
Message: 14
From: "Fletcher, Joe" <joe.fletcher at Metapack.com>
To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: RE: [SunHELP] Installing LS command
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:05:38 +0100
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Have you seen the recent advisory regarding the snmpXdmid hack? There was a
post on this subject this morning courtesy of Nicholas Dronen. If not it's
worth reading since it may be pertinent to your situation.
-----Original Message-----
From: souleymane kante [mailto:kante at globeaccess.net]
Sent: 2 April 2001 10:59
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org; list at inet-access.net
Subject: [SunHELP] Installing LS command
Hi
My problem with LS command is not solved. Only root can see files and
directories contents with the LS command.
I want install a new LS command from the solaris software CDROM. Is it
possible ?
Could this solve the problem ?
I have solaris 2.5.1. The LS command is attached to the directory
/s0/Solaris_2.5.1/SUNWcsu on the solaris 2.5.1 CDROM.
How to install it ?
regards,
Souleymane
_______________________________________________
SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
MetaPack
The Lightwell
12/16 Laystall Street
Clerkenwell
London EC1R 4PF
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7843 6720
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7843 6721
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email is confidential and proprietary;
all information contained in it must be used only by the addressee in
accordance with MetaPack's terms of business and non-disclosure agreement.
Disclosure, copying, and distribution to, or use by, anyone other than the
intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
--__--__--
Message: 15
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 11:54:54 +0000
From: david <dcg at seric.es>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: [SunHELP] problem with cron
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
--------------819A093B2A15F3AED8A37693
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Hi ,
>
> i've a SunOS 5.8 on a Sparc-20 and i've found that last weekend my
> daemons "cron" crashed, when i've gone
> to start it i've found in a "/var/cron/log" the next message :
>
> 1---> ! *** cron started *** pid = 352 Mon Apr 2 13:34:53 2001
> 2---> ! unexpected pid returned 354 (ignored) Mon Apr 2 13:34:55 2001
>
>
>
> and what does line 2 mean ?
>
> Thank you !!
>
> --
> David Cortada Gracia
> dpto Sistemas
> Ylos Hispania SL
>
>
--
David Cortada Gracia
dpto Sistemas
Ylos Hispania SL
--------------819A093B2A15F3AED8A37693
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Hi ,
<p>i've a SunOS 5.8 on a Sparc-20 and i've found that last weekend my
daemons
"cron" crashed, when i've gone
<br>to start it i've found in a "/var/cron/log" the next message :
<p>1---> ! *** cron started *** pid = 352 Mon Apr 2
13:34:53
2001
<br>2---> ! unexpected pid returned 354 (ignored) Mon Apr 2 13:34:55
2001
<br>
<pre>and what does line 2 mean ?</pre>
<pre>Thank you !!</pre>
<pre>--
David Cortada Gracia
dpto Sistemas
Ylos Hispania SL</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>--
David Cortada Gracia
dpto Sistemas
Ylos Hispania SL</pre>
</html>
--------------819A093B2A15F3AED8A37693--
--__--__--
Message: 16
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 11:06:22 +0000
From: souleymane kante <kante at globeaccess.net>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Cc: joe.fletcher at Metapack.com
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Installing LS command
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
no I didn't see it .
could someone forward it to me
"Fletcher, Joe" wrote:
> Have you seen the recent advisory regarding the snmpXdmid hack? There was
a
> post on this subject this morning courtesy of Nicholas Dronen. If not it's
> worth reading since it may be pertinent to your situation.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: souleymane kante [mailto:kante at globeaccess.net]
> Sent: 2 April 2001 10:59
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org; list at inet-access.net
> Subject: [SunHELP] Installing LS command
>
> Hi
> My problem with LS command is not solved. Only root can see files and
> directories contents with the LS command.
> I want install a new LS command from the solaris software CDROM. Is it
> possible ?
> Could this solve the problem ?
> I have solaris 2.5.1. The LS command is attached to the directory
> /s0/Solaris_2.5.1/SUNWcsu on the solaris 2.5.1 CDROM.
> How to install it ?
> regards,
> Souleymane
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
> MetaPack
> The Lightwell
> 12/16 Laystall Street
> Clerkenwell
> London EC1R 4PF
> Tel: +44 (0) 20 7843 6720
> Fax: +44 (0) 20 7843 6721
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email is confidential and proprietary;
> all information contained in it must be used only by the addressee in
> accordance with MetaPack's terms of business and non-disclosure agreement.
> Disclosure, copying, and distribution to, or use by, anyone other than the
> intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
--__--__--
Message: 17
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 11:00:10 -0400
From: Suhas Kamble <suhas.kamble at bms.com>
Subject: RE: [SunHELP] Installing LS command
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
here it is..
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/648304
-----Original Message-----
From: sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org [mailto:sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org]On
Behalf Of souleymane kante
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 7:06 AM
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Cc: joe.fletcher at Metapack.com
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Installing LS command
no I didn't see it .
could someone forward it to me
"Fletcher, Joe" wrote:
> Have you seen the recent advisory regarding the snmpXdmid hack? There was
a
> post on this subject this morning courtesy of Nicholas Dronen. If not it's
> worth reading since it may be pertinent to your situation.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: souleymane kante [mailto:kante at globeaccess.net]
> Sent: 2 April 2001 10:59
> To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org; list at inet-access.net
> Subject: [SunHELP] Installing LS command
>
> Hi
> My problem with LS command is not solved. Only root can see files and
> directories contents with the LS command.
> I want install a new LS command from the solaris software CDROM. Is it
> possible ?
> Could this solve the problem ?
> I have solaris 2.5.1. The LS command is attached to the directory
> /s0/Solaris_2.5.1/SUNWcsu on the solaris 2.5.1 CDROM.
> How to install it ?
> regards,
> Souleymane
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
> MetaPack
> The Lightwell
> 12/16 Laystall Street
> Clerkenwell
> London EC1R 4PF
> Tel: +44 (0) 20 7843 6720
> Fax: +44 (0) 20 7843 6721
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email is confidential and proprietary;
> all information contained in it must be used only by the addressee in
> accordance with MetaPack's terms of business and non-disclosure agreement.
> Disclosure, copying, and distribution to, or use by, anyone other than the
> intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
_______________________________________________
SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
End of SunHELP Digest
More information about the SunHELP
mailing list