[rescue] The Practical Guide to FDDI
Phil Brutsche
phil at tux.obix.com
Thu Mar 27 23:47:22 CST 2003
Chris Hedemark wrote:
> On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 06:01 PM, jwbirdsa at picarefy.com wrote:
>
>> what technical mistakes have I made?
>
>
> "Even though it has the same speed as Fast Ethernet (100Mbps), FDDI is
> more efficient because it has a much larger MTU. Ethernet is limited to
> a packet size of 1536 bytes."
>
> Not so. That's just the default setting. Unless you have a Sun
> ethernet card (at least the gigabit ones, anyway, I'm not sure about the
> HME's) you can bump the MTU size effectively to 9000 bytes or so. 9000
> bytes is a good size because NFS frames are 8K and the extra accounts
> for the packet overhead.
Jumbo frames are specific to Gigabit ethernet, and it's also the only
way to get anywhere near 100MB/sec (GigE runs at 350MHz; using the
"normal" 1500 byte MTU you're limited to 20MB/sec). It's part of the
GigE specification.
If you set the MTU much higher (I don't think you can), it won't be
ethernet anymore :) The checksum used by ethernet breaks once you get
past 11000 bytes or so.
10/100 cards (such as HMEs) can't do jumbo frames. If you try to set
the MTU past 1500 bytes (or whatever the value is these days) on 10/100
cards you'll get "Invalid argument" or something similar.
> The small default MTU on ethernet is just there for backwards
> compatibility. And actually, it is up to 1540 bytes now (an extra 4
> bytes was added at some point).
The extra bytes are for VLAN tagging, I think.
--
Phil Brutsche
phil at tux.obix.com
More information about the rescue
mailing list