[rescue] ST15150{N|WC} firmware?

Thu Feb 13 03:48:16 CST 2003

Bjorn Ramqvist wrote:
> From rescue-bounces at sunhelp.org  Thu Feb 13 10:50:04 2003
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> 	by cyphunk.lan (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1D8o4oF011276
> 	for <gsm at localhost>; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:50:04 +0200
> X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
> Received: from mail.lan [192.168.1.251]
> 	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0)
> 	for gsm at localhost (single-drop); Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:50:04 +0200 (IST)
> Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [192.168.2.200])
> 	by mail.mobileye.co.il (Postfix on MobilEye mail server) with ESMTP id 14533FFFE
> 	for <geoffrey.mendelson at mobileye.co.il>; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:49:28 +0200 (IST)
> Received: (from uucp at localhost)
> 	by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id h1CMY2618234
> 	for geoffrey.mendelson at mobileye.co.il; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:34:02 +0200
> Received: from mx02.futurequest.net (mx02.futurequest.net [63.151.147.172])
> 	by mrelay.mobileye.co.il (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h1D8ZXK17946
> 	for <geoffrey.mendelson at mobileye.co.il>; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:35:49 +0200
> Received: (qmail 2800 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2003 08:48:02 -0000
> Received: from pt02.futurequest.net (69.5.6.173)
>   by mx02.futurequest.net with QMQP; 13 Feb 2003 08:48:02 -0000
> Delivered-To: geoffrey.mendelson at mobileye.com
> Received: (fqmail 22988 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2003 08:48:02 -0000
> Received: from mx01.futurequest.net (69.5.6.171)
>   by pt02.futurequest.net (69.5.6.173) with FQDP; 13 Feb 2003 08:48:02 -0000
> Received: (qmail 19898 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2003 08:48:02 -0000
> Received: from mx01.futurequest.net (69.5.6.171)
>   by mx01.futurequest.net (69.5.6.171 ); 13 Feb 2003 08:48:02 -0000
> Received: from unknown (HELO ohno.mrbill.net) (207.200.6.75)
>   by mx01.futurequest.net (69.5.6.171) with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2003 08:48:02 -0000
> Received: from ohno.mrbill.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> 	by ohno.mrbill.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
> 	id DD68352F9E; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 02:47:49 -0600 (CST)
> X-Original-To: rescue at sunhelp.org
> Delivered-To: rescue at sunhelp.org
> Received: from heimdall.haggve.se (heimdall.haggve.se [195.198.88.10])
>   by ohno.mrbill.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D076F52F27 for
>   <rescue at sunhelp.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 02:47:43 -0600 (CST)
> Received: from skalman.haggve.com (fw-dmz.haggve.se [195.198.88.3]) by
>   heimdall.haggve.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA00717 for
>   <rescue at sunhelp.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 09:47:42 +0100
> Received: from g.haggve.se (dhcp106.haggve.com [172.28.16.106]) by
>   skalman.haggve.com (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h1D8lgbe025981 for
>   <rescue at sunhelp.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 09:47:42 +0100
> Message-ID: <3E4B5C01.BB93D370 at g.haggve.se>
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 09:49:05 +0100
> From: Bjorn Ramqvist <v53278 at g.haggve.se>
> Organization: Alvis Hagglunds AB
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: The Rescue List <rescue at sunhelp.org>
> Subject: Re: [rescue] ST15150{N|WC} firmware?
> References: <GFELJLLNJAJEDFCGFHMMAEOBCHAA.Marc.Gutschner at Triplan.COM>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-BeenThere: rescue at sunhelp.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
> Precedence: list
> Reply-To: The Rescue List <rescue at sunhelp.org>
> List-Id: The Rescue List <rescue.sunhelp.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue>,
> 	<mailto:rescue-request at sunhelp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: </pipermail>
> List-Post: <mailto:rescue at sunhelp.org>
> List-Help: <mailto:rescue-request at sunhelp.org?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue>,
> 	<mailto:rescue-request at sunhelp.org?subject=subscribe>
> Sender: rescue-bounces at sunhelp.org
> Errors-To: rescue-bounces at sunhelp.org
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0
> 	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
> 	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_XM,X_ACCEPT_LANG
> 	version=2.43
> X-Spam-Level: 
> 
> Marc Gutschner wrote:
> > 
> > Oh, while I'me at it: How probable is it that X-raying damages a disk? 
> Sounds just like a case of mine, when we bought 20-or-so drives from
> some eBay seller. "tested, working", but 40% of them was hosed.

Generally X-Rays themselves will not damage a hard drive. However the magnetic
fields from the motors in the machines, or if they are high enough power
there may be magnetic leakage from other parts in the machine. 

If the packages were clearly marked "Magnetic Material DO NOT X-RAY" with 
the proper sticker, then the carrier is at fault. If not, the seller is.

Geoff.

-- 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson
MobilEye Vision Technologies Ltd, R.M.P.E House, 10 Hartom St. Har Hotzvim
Jerusalem, 91450 Israel Tel: +972-2-5417-356 Cell: +972-55-667-090
Do sysadmins count networked sheep?