[rescue] E3000's

[Dave McGuire]

On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 02:39 PM, Jonathan C. Patschke wrote:
>> How about the Patschke?
>
> That'd be silly (and hard to spell).
>
> Also, now that I think about it, it's pretty hard to clearly define a
> VUP on a non-DEC system.  I still like my idea of clockrate x avg IPC.
>
> But neither of these take into account memory bandwidth or other
> niftiness, and we can't have PCs winning a rescue-defined benchmark,
> now can we?

   Well, most x86 implementations (at least the ones I've looked at) 
don't have particularly good CPAI numbers, man.  I don't think we're in 
danger of that any time soon, at least until Intel focuses on something 
other that process technology and marketing.

       -Dave

--
Dave McGuire                 "You don't have Vaseline in Canada?"
St. Petersburg, FL                     -Bill Bradford