[rescue] O2 graphics compared to entry-level Octane graphics?
nick at snowman.net
nick at snowman.net
Thu Apr 25 12:19:55 CDT 2002
The only drawback I've found (other than textureing) is WEIGHT! That
blasted thing weighs a ton. If you're ever going to be moveing it alone
stay with the o2, it's a good 30-40lbs lighter.
Nick
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Bill Bradford wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:29:08AM -0400, Kurt Huhn wrote:
> > I mentioned Lightwave, wich I use on the Octane almost exclusively. The
> > Octane is very good about displaying and manipulating models in 3D, on
> > the O2 it can seriously suck if you have a complex model.
>
> Hrm.. I'm asking because I'm considering seeing about "trading up" from
> the O2 to an entry-level Octane (O2 R5K 180 vs. Octane R10K 195 w/SI gfx).
>
> Thoughts? If I'm gonna have a SGI at home it might as well be a BEEFY one. 8-)
>
> Bill
>
> --
> Bill Bradford
> mrbill at mrbill.net
> Austin, TX
> _______________________________________________
> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
More information about the rescue
mailing list