[SunRescue] Low-Bandwidth X

Bill Bradford rescue at sunhelp.org
Mon Mar 12 19:30:20 CST 2001


On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 07:10:58PM -0500, Joshua D. Boyd wrote:
> Hmm, I sent that email 6 or 7 hours ago.  Talk about email lag.

Yeah, I'm going through and optimizing some of the lists.  This is a
fairly small list, but it has to fight for queue with stuff like the
Sun-Managers list (3000+ members, 50-60 posts a day).

I'm upgrading to Postfix soon, which should solve a lot of that.  I
can prioritize traffic.

Bill

> 
> --
> Joshua Boyd
> 
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Joshua D. Boyd wrote:
> 
> > Actually, that was me who suggested that.  The person who aquired a Sun3
> > to run NeWS (although I still can't the machine's ehternet to work. )  
> > 
> > As to Display Postscript, I don't have what I wrote in front of me, but I
> > only meant to suggest that DPS might be more efficient.  I dona't have any
> > sample stuff to test that ieda with.  My understanding is that Suns and
> > SGIs still have DPS, but if it is installed on the sun I have access to,
> > then the man pages are broken.  Also, the DPS headers can't seem to be
> > found by the compiler.  There is a DPS overvuew in the man system, but
> > nothing more specific. 
> > 
> > XFree (for linux) requires a seperate module be downloaded, compiled and
> > installed.  Haven't had time to do that.  Also, haven't had time to
> > investigate DPS on an SGI, but in addition to the SGI, I'm going to need
> > it on either sun or linux to do any testing.
> > 
> > Old software (NeWS, DPS, Symbolics Lisp( is one of my passions.
> > 
> > Sorry for the typos.  I'm in a hurry and on a slow link.
> > 
> > --
> > Joshua Boyd
> > 
> > On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, William Staniewicz wrote:
> > 
> > > Today on Slashdot there is a discussion of "Low-Bandwidth X".
> > > One of the people posting suggested that Sun's original NeWS and
> > > DPS solved this problem. He further claims that Display
> > > Postscript is more bandwidth efficient than plain X.
> > > 
> > > A quick search at sun.com shows NeWS being offered in
> > > Solaris 1 but replaced in Solaris 2 (If I am reading this correctly).
> > > 
> > > What do you think? Is this an example of an old idea
> > > addressing a contemporary situation? I guess I am curious
> > > since I am somewhat of a retro type person who appreciates
> > > things like lynx, mwm, etc.
> > > 
> > > 		-Bill
> > > 		Amsterdam, NL
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rescue maillist  -  rescue at sunhelp.org
> > > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
> > > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > rescue maillist  -  rescue at sunhelp.org
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rescue maillist  -  rescue at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue

-- 
Bill Bradford
mrbill at mrbill.net
Austin, TX



More information about the rescue mailing list