[SunRescue] Best prices on SS20/Ultra compatible RAM... and s ome disk pointer s/finds
Kurt Mosiejczuk
kurt at csh.rit.edu
Wed Jun 28 13:56:40 CDT 2000
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> I can post some benchmarks that I did on my SS20. The machine is a dual
> SM41, 128MB of ram, 4GB IBM SCSI SCA drive. Running Solaris, from the
> console login, I ran tiobench (it's a multi-threaded benchmarking program).
> With a data size of 768MB, it was able to read and write about 7MB/sec to
> that disk. From Linux, on the SAME disk, at the console, it was able to
> write about 3MB/sec. Mind you, that's still quite a bit faster than
> ethernet, but it's still pretty darn awful, compared to Solaris. On a 3
> disk RAID 0, Linux got the same read speed, so it's a problem with the ESP
> SCSI driver on linux, and not something with the drive. If I could get a
> 100Mbit ethernet card for my SPARCs, I suspect that it would be faster than
> the disk.
Ok... it mainly piqued my interest because using an NFS root under
Linux/sun3 is ACTUALLY faster than using a local disk (DMA doesn't
work right last I checked). I do know that Linux's SCSI subsystem
isn't top notch and an overhaul is planned in 2.5. The annoying
"sda/sdb/sdc" thing has bitten me before... I like Solaris's c0t0d0s0
method MUCH better.
I am curious as to which version of the kernel you used though, I do
know that the Debian sparc people consider the 2.2 kernel the first
"real" kernel for the sparc architecture.
> P.S. careful about using SPARC/linux, SPARC international may come after
> you for (ab)using their registered trademark.
Shhhhhh... you weren't supposed to point that out =)
--Kurt
More information about the rescue
mailing list