[geeks] Sempron 64

Geoffrey S. Mendelson gsm at mendelson.com
Wed Jan 31 01:05:59 CST 2007


On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:51:23AM -0500, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:

> The prices are so close as to be effectively identical.  Anyone know 
> which one would be faster?  The AMD "speed rating" indicates that the 
> 3000+ would be faster, but I don't know how much of that is marketing 
> bullshit.

Just about all of that. When the PIV came out, it was a poor performer
in terms of clock cycles. A 1.4gHz PIV was slower than a 1gHz PIII.
AMD capitalized on this and I have several machines from that era,
that vastly over rate that speed. Such as a 1400 (1gHz), 2000 (1.3gHz),
2200 (1.4gHz).

My significantly later PIV 1.7gHz is much faster than any of them. 
My 2.6 gHz PIV is twice as fast as the "2200".

Also isn't the Sempron the "Cellery-ron" of AMD? Cheap, but not a good
performer.

Geoff.


-- 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel gsm at mendelson.com  N3OWJ/4X1GM
IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667  Fax ONLY: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 
Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/



More information about the geeks mailing list