[SunHELP] IP ports
Lara Matthews
lara.matthews at accesscomputing.co.uk
Mon Jun 14 09:57:11 CDT 2004
Hi Predrag
Predrag Zecevic - Solaris System Administrator wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it should behave as two separate, physical interfaces... so TWO
> addresses = TWO ports 80
>
That is what I thought but it doesn't seem to work.
> * what 'ifconfig -a' shows
> * how did you discovered that something (what exactly?) doesn't work?
>
lo0: flags=1000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
eri0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 213.128.229.177 netmask fffffff0 broadcast 213.128.229.191
ether 0:3:ba:8:55:2
eri0:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 213.128.229.178 netmask fffffff0 broadcast 213.128.229.191
eri0:2: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 213.128.229.179 netmask fffffff0 broadcast 213.128.229.191
I start webmail on 213.128.229.178 and it starts fine.
I start calendar in 213.128.229.179 and it says it can not bind to port
80. If I tell it to start in port 81 it comnes up fine.
Very odd.
Regards
Lara
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
More information about the SunHELP
mailing list