[SunHELP] IP ports

Lara Matthews lara.matthews at accesscomputing.co.uk
Mon Jun 14 09:57:11 CDT 2004


Hi Predrag

Predrag Zecevic - Solaris System Administrator wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> it should behave as two separate, physical interfaces... so TWO 
> addresses = TWO ports 80
> 

That is what I thought but it doesn't seem to work.

>    * what 'ifconfig -a' shows
>    * how did you discovered that something (what exactly?) doesn't work?
>
lo0: flags=1000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 8232 index 1
         inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
eri0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
         inet 213.128.229.177 netmask fffffff0 broadcast 213.128.229.191
         ether 0:3:ba:8:55:2
eri0:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
         inet 213.128.229.178 netmask fffffff0 broadcast 213.128.229.191
eri0:2: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
         inet 213.128.229.179 netmask fffffff0 broadcast 213.128.229.191

I start webmail on 213.128.229.178 and it starts fine.

I start calendar in 213.128.229.179 and it says it can not bind to port 
80.  If I tell it to start in port 81 it comnes up fine.

Very odd.

Regards

Lara

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]



More information about the SunHELP mailing list