[SunHELP] Re.Unix group limitation?
Jarrett Carver
solarboyz1 at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 24 20:05:25 CST 2002
I am not sure, I have'nt seen anything that lists an upper limit on this.
But I have found the following in man getgrpnam(3c)
ERANGE
The group file contains a line that exceeds 512 bytes.
The getgrnam_r(), getgrgid_r(), and getgrent_r() functions
may fail if:
ERANGE
Insufficient storage was supplied by buffer and buf-
size to contain the data to be referenced by the
resulting group structure.
I have a rather large groups on some systems I have, I get an error when
running grpck, "Line too long". But it does'nt seem to have an adverse
effect on any of the users in the group.
>From: VLava Kumar <vlkumar at hns.com>
>Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
>Subject: [SunHELP] Re.Unix group limitation?
>Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:11:53 -0500
>
>Hi,
> Can any one tell how many userids can a group hold ? is it
>possible to increase
>limitations ?
>Thanks ,
>Lava
>sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org wrote:
>
> > Send SunHELP mailing list submissions to
> > sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of SunHELP digest..."
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. unsubscribe (Cao.External at infineon.com)
> > 2. SUN CERTIFIED SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE SOLARIS[tm] 8
> > OPERATIN G ENVIRONMENT UPGRADE EXAM (OFrayman)
> > 3. Ancient UNIX licenses! (Bill Bradford)
> > 4. RE: SUN CERTIFIED SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE
> > SOLARIS[ tm] 8 OPERATIN G ENVIRONMENT UPGRADE EXAM
>(Sangbutsarakum, Patai)
> > 5. Re: C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite (Dennis Murphy)
> > 6. Newbie question about GCC (johnlee)
> > 7. ide harddisk on ultra10 (Martin Walter)
> > 8. Changing passwords through remote SSH command??? (Robert Banniza)
> > 9. Re: Changing passwords through remote SSH command??? (Dale Ghent)
> > 10. RE: ide harddisk on ultra10 (Peter Stokes)
> > 11. Re: ide harddisk on ultra10 (s at avoidant.org)
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 1
> > From: Cao.External at infineon.com
> > To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 20:05:25 +0100
> > Subject: [SunHELP] unsubscribe
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org [mailto:sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:01 PM
> > To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> > Subject: SunHELP digest, Vol 1 #1485 - 12 msgs
> >
> > Send SunHELP mailing list submissions to
> > sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of SunHELP digest..."
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: Help needed (Dale Ghent)
> > 2. Fw: Re: (timuel)
> > 3. Re: Fw: Re: (Will Yardley)
> > 4. Re: Fw: Re: (Kurt Huhn)
> > 5. C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite (Bill Bradford)
> > 6. secure RPC problem (Mahadi Yusof)
> > 7. RE: C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite (Kirkby, David)
> > 8. RE: C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite (Kirkby, David)
> > 9. Unix group limitation? (Meng, Andrew)
> > 10. Re: Unix group limitation? (Jarrett Carver)
> > 11. Re: Unix group limitation? (Dale Ghent)
> > 12. RE: Unix group limitation? (Ravi_Thotapalli at csaa.com)
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:00:37 -0500 (EST)
> > From: Dale Ghent <daleg at elemental.org>
> > To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> > Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Help needed
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Rajesh Vadde wrote:
> >
> > | Hi All,
> > | Does anybody is having any comparision chart between Sun IP Multi
>pathing
> > | and Sun Trunking.?
> > |
> > | I want to get the differences between these two and also what are the
> > | advantages of each one as compared to other.
> >
> > I havnt seen any chart that specifically compares the two, but you can
> > probably come up with one by reading the overviews in the documentation
> > for each:
> >
> > for IP Multipathing:
> >
> >
>http://docs.sun.com/ab2/coll.780.2/IPNETMPADMIN/@Ab2TocView?Ab2Lang=C&Ab2Enc=iso-8859-1
> >
> > for Sun Trunking:
> >
> > ftp://192.18.99.138/806-4207-10/806-4207-10.pdf
> >
> > /dale
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 2
> > From: "timuel" <timuel-sunlist at voicenet.com>
> > To: <tech at openbsd.org>, <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:40:15 -0500
> > Subject: [SunHELP] Fw: Re:
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > Thanks for the "info.DOC.scr" and the "ATT00721.txt" attached to the
>below
> > email! I`ve been waiting for them my entire life!
> >
> > @$$hole.
> >
> > Anyone else get this or is this or am I the only one? These lists are
>the only
> > two places I use this address... watch out i guess.
> >
> > http://vil.mcafee.com/dispVirus.asp?virus_k=99069&
> >
> > --
> > timuel
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > Return-Path: <raidpingu at snoopsworld.de>
> > Delivered-To: timuel-sunlist at voicenet.com
> > Received: (qmail 28462 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2002 20:29:39 -0000
> > Received: from natpost.webmailer.de (HELO post.webmailer.de)
>(192.67.198.65)
> > by mail11.voicenet.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2002 20:29:39 -0000
> > Received: from aol.com (pD9032F63.dip.t-dialin.net [217.3.47.99])
> > by post.webmailer.de (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA01398
> > for <timuel-sunlist at voicenet.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:29:31 +0100
>(MET)
> > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:29:31 +0100 (MET)
> > Message-Id: <200201222029.VAA01398 at post.webmailer.de>
> > From: "raidpingu" <_raidpingu at snoopsworld.de>
> > To: timuel-sunlist at voicenet.com
> > Subject: Re:
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: multipart/related;
> > type="multipart/alternative";
> > boundary="====_ABC1234567890DEF_===="
> > X-Priority: 3
> > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > X-Unsent: 1
> > From: raidpingu
> > To: timuel-sunlist at voicenet.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:29 PM
> > Subject: Re:
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:48:14 -0800
> > From: Will Yardley <william+sun at hq.newdream.net>
> > To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> > Organization: New Dream Network
> > Subject: [SunHELP] Re: Fw: Re:
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > timuel wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the "info.DOC.scr" and the "ATT00721.txt" attached to the
> > > below email! I`ve been waiting for them my entire life!
> > >
> > > @$$hole.
> >
> > perhaps (s)he was just sending you those files to have your advice?
> > :>
> >
> > of course if you use a different email client than OE you're less likely
> > to be affected by stuff like this (even though it's annoying already).
> >
> > realistically, while it's annoying that some people get viruses and pass
> > them along, namecalling isn't really going to get you far. trying to
> > explain what's going on to the person whose computer is infected is
> > probably going to be more effective in the long run.
> >
> > w
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 4
> > From: "Kurt Huhn" <kurt at k-huhn.com>
> > To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Fw: Re:
> > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:28:19 -0500
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > > Anyone else get this or is this or am I the only one? These lists are
>the
> > only
> > > two places I use this address... watch out i guess.
> > >
> >
> > errr...whut?
> >
> > I suppose you have virus protection software? If not, it's probably
>your
> > own fault if you got infected. Personal responsibility...
> >
> > At the very minimum, complaining to two whole lists isn't going to get
>you
> > anywhere. How about tracking down the original sender and letting him
>know
> > he has a virus?
> >
> > And yes, you're the only one...
> >
> > Kurt
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:49:52 -0600
> > From: Bill Bradford <mrbill at mrbill.net>
> > To: sunhelp at mrbill.net
> > Subject: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > Anybody know about a Creator 3D series3 versus an Expert3D-Lite, in
> > terms of desktop (2D, 24bit) performance?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > --
> > Bill Bradford
> > mrbill at mrbill.net
> > Austin, TX
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 6
> > From: "Mahadi Yusof" <mahadi at cs.usm.my>
> > To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:32:33 +0800
> > Subject: [SunHELP] secure RPC problem
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > Hi all,
> > One of the user says he cannot login to the system. It says 'user needs
> > secure RPC to log in, but none available'.
> > What is the problem is?
> >
> > -------------------------------------
> > Mahadi Yusof
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 7
> > From: "Kirkby, David" <David.Kirkby at marconi.com>
> > To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Subject: RE: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:49:12 -0000
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > I asked exactly the same question the other day on comp.sys.sun.admin.
> > Although the Elite3D is the more expensive framebuffer, the Creator3D
>does
> > have some advantages. For instance, the resolution of the Elite is lower
>-
> > see
> > http://www.sun.com/desktop/products/graphics/expert3d/expert3djtf.html
> > Someone pointed out there are some benchmarks on Sun's website
> > http://www.sun.com/desktop/products/Graphics/graphicsbenchmks.pdf
> > You will notice the Elite3D wins most of them, but I think the one it
>looses
> > (Xmark93) is 2D.
> >
> > The framebuffer FAQ at
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/faq/FrameBuffer.html
> > says "The problem is that as with the ZX, the Elite is geared towards
> > high-end applications. It's not a frame buffer for the casual user; in
>most
> > cases I would prefer the Creator 3D running at 1600x1200 in 24 bit
>mode."
> >
> > I'm in the position of having an Ultra 60 and an Ultra 30. The U30 will
>be
> > sold and the U60 kept, but I don't know what framebuffer to sell. Having
> > tried the two for 3D use, I can detect no difference. Both are very fast
>on
> > my U60 and my monitor does not allow above 1280x1024. I think I'll keep
>the
> > Elite3D-m3, since I might get a 3D application that can make more use of
>it,
> > but are not sure.
> >
> > If anyone else has some comments, I'd like to know of them.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill Bradford [mailto:mrbill at mrbill.net]
> > Sent: 22 January 2002 23:50
> > To: sunhelp at mrbill.net
> > Subject: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
> >
> > Anybody know about a Creator 3D series3 versus an Expert3D-Lite, in
> > terms of desktop (2D, 24bit) performance?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > --
> > Bill Bradford
> > mrbill at mrbill.net
> > Austin, TX
> > _______________________________________________
> > SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 8
> > From: "Kirkby, David" <David.Kirkby at marconi.com>
> > To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Subject: RE: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:07:20 -0000
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > I said in the last email I compared the two framebuffers for *3D* use
>and
> > found no difference. I did not mean to say that !!!
> > I meant to say I compared them in *2D* applications, and found no
> > perceptible difference. Both seem 'instant' to my brain (perhaps my
>brain
> > has just slowed). I've not personally compared them in 3D use.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kirkby, David [mailto:David.Kirkby at marconi.com]
> > Sent: 23 January 2002 10:49
> > To: 'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'
> > Subject: RE: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
> >
> > I asked exactly the same question the other day on comp.sys.sun.admin.
> > Although the Elite3D is the more expensive framebuffer, the Creator3D
>does
> > have some advantages. For instance, the resolution of the Elite is lower
>-
> > see
> > http://www.sun.com/desktop/products/graphics/expert3d/expert3djtf.html
> > Someone pointed out there are some benchmarks on Sun's website
> > http://www.sun.com/desktop/products/Graphics/graphicsbenchmks.pdf
> > You will notice the Elite3D wins most of them, but I think the one it
>looses
> > (Xmark93) is 2D.
> >
> > The framebuffer FAQ at
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/faq/FrameBuffer.html
> > says "The problem is that as with the ZX, the Elite is geared towards
> > high-end applications. It's not a frame buffer for the casual user; in
>most
> > cases I would prefer the Creator 3D running at 1600x1200 in 24 bit
>mode."
> >
> > I'm in the position of having an Ultra 60 and an Ultra 30. The U30 will
>be
> > sold and the U60 kept, but I don't know what framebuffer to sell. Having
> > tried the two for 3D use, I can detect no difference. Both are very fast
>on
> > my U60 and my monitor does not allow above 1280x1024. I think I'll keep
>the
> > Elite3D-m3, since I might get a 3D application that can make more use of
>it,
> > but are not sure.
> >
> > If anyone else has some comments, I'd like to know of them.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill Bradford [mailto:mrbill at mrbill.net]
> > Sent: 22 January 2002 23:50
> > To: sunhelp at mrbill.net
> > Subject: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
> >
> > Anybody know about a Creator 3D series3 versus an Expert3D-Lite, in
> > terms of desktop (2D, 24bit) performance?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > --
> > Bill Bradford
> > mrbill at mrbill.net
> > Austin, TX
> > _______________________________________________
> > SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> > _______________________________________________
> > SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 9
> > From: "Meng, Andrew" <Andrew.Meng at capitalone.com>
> > To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:51:10 -0500
> > Subject: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > How many groups can a Unix id be in on Solaris, any limitation on
>Solaris or
> > other flavors of Unix? Thanks!
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
>**************************************************************************
> > The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended
>only
> > for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the
>reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>that
> > any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or
>other
> > use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is
> > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> > please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 10
> > From: "Jarrett Carver" <solarboyz1 at hotmail.com>
> > To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> > Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:06:10
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > >From man group(4)
> >
> > If a user is in more groups than the system is configured for,
> > {NGROUPS_MAX}, a warning will be given and subsequent group
> > specifications will be ignored.
> >
> > To find NGROUPS_MAX
> >
> > # echo ngroups_max/D | adb -k /dev/ksyms /dev/mem
> > physmem 79f0
> > ngroups_max:
> > ngroups_max: 16
> >
> > #
> >
> > >From: "Meng, Andrew" <Andrew.Meng at capitalone.com>
> > >Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> > >To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > >Subject: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
> > >Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:51:10 -0500
> > >
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >How many groups can a Unix id be in on Solaris, any limitation on
>Solaris
> > >or
> > >other flavors of Unix? Thanks!
> > >
> > >Andrew
> > >
> >
> >**************************************************************************
> > >The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended
>only
> > >for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the
>reader
> > >of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>that
> > >any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or
>other
> > >use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is
> > >strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> > >please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> > >http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> >
> > Jarrett Carver http://www.geocities.com/solarboyz1
> > solarboyz1 at hotmail.com Unix/NT Systems Administrator
> > ___________________________________________________________
> > "When people sigh 'Life is hard', I am always tempted to
> > ask 'compared to what?'".
> > - Sydney Harris
> > ____________________________________________________________
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 11
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:07:45 -0500 (EST)
> > From: Dale Ghent <daleg at elemental.org>
> > To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Meng, Andrew wrote:
> >
> > | Hello,
> > |
> > | How many groups can a Unix id be in on Solaris, any limitation on
>Solaris or
> > | other flavors of Unix? Thanks!
> >
> > man -s4 group
> >
> > /dale
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > Message: 12
> > From: Ravi_Thotapalli at csaa.com
> > To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> > Subject: RE: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 08:11:37 -0800
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > I guess its 16 (first group the primary and the rest of 15 secondary
>groups)
> > hope this helps...
> >
> > ravi
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Meng, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Meng at capitalone.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 7:51 AM
> > To: 'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'
> > Subject: [SunHELP] Unix group limitation?
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > How many groups can a Unix id be in on Solaris, any limitation on
>Solaris or
> > other flavors of Unix? Thanks!
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
>**************************************************************************
> > The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended
>only
> > for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the
>reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>that
> > any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or
>other
> > use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is
> > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> > please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
> > _______________________________________________
> > SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> >
> > -- __--__--
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> >
> > End of SunHELP Digest
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 2
> > From: OFrayman <OFrayman at VerticalAlliance.com>
> > To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:30:31 -0500
> > Subject: [SunHELP] SUN CERTIFIED SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE
>SOLARIS[tm] 8
> > OPERATIN G ENVIRONMENT UPGRADE EXAM
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > Does anybody have related material for this exam. I just finished
>Solaris 7
> > Certification and want to upgrade to 8 before Jan 31st
> > Your help will be highly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Oleg Frayman
> > 190 W. Germantown Pike, Suite 210
> > Norristown , PA. 19401-1385
> > Phone: 610-278-1838 x147 Fax 610-278-6638
> > mailto:ofrayman at verticalalliance.com
> > "Customer Interaction & Ticketing Solutions
> > for the Sports, Media & Entertainment Industries"
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:16:42 -0600
> > From: Bill Bradford <mrbill at mrbill.net>
> > To: geeks at mrbill.net, rescue at mrbill.net, sunhelp at mrbill.net
> > Subject: [SunHELP] Ancient UNIX licenses!
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > This *really* kicks ass:
> >
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/ancient-source.pdf
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > --
> > Bill Bradford
> > mrbill at mrbill.net
> > Austin, TX
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 4
> > From: "Sangbutsarakum, Patai" <patais at reach.com>
> > To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Subject: RE: [SunHELP] SUN CERTIFIED SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE
> > SOLARIS[ tm] 8 OPERATIN G ENVIRONMENT UPGRADE EXAM
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:43:48 +0700
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > I'm preparing for Solaris 7 Part II,
> > Could u please point me the exam guide that
> > ask in the same way as real exam?
> >
> > Thanks in advances
> > Patrick
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: OFrayman [mailto:OFrayman at VerticalAlliance.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 06:31
> > To: 'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'
> > Subject: [SunHELP] SUN CERTIFIED SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE
>SOLARIS[tm] 8
> > OPERATIN G ENVIRONMENT UPGRADE EXAM
> >
> > Does anybody have related material for this exam. I just finished
>Solaris 7
> > Certification and want to upgrade to 8 before Jan 31st
> > Your help will be highly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Oleg Frayman
> > 190 W. Germantown Pike, Suite 210
> > Norristown , PA. 19401-1385
> > Phone: 610-278-1838 x147 Fax 610-278-6638
> > mailto:ofrayman at verticalalliance.com
> > "Customer Interaction & Ticketing Solutions
> > for the Sports, Media & Entertainment Industries"
> > _______________________________________________
> > SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:15:43 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [SunHELP] C3D s3 vs. Expert3D-Lite
> > From: Dennis Murphy <dmurphy at osxadm.com>
> > To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > > Anybody know about a Creator 3D series3 versus an Expert3D-Lite, in
> > > terms of desktop (2D, 24bit) performance?
> >
> > By the Expert3D-Lite, I assume you mean that "thing" that ships
>in
> > the Blade 100.
> >
> > Rough estimates (nothing official, just my own observation) says that
> > the 2D performance is almost the same. As long as you're not using any
> > 3d-spinning-wingdings rendered in OpenGL, it's barely noticeable.
> >
> > The C3D is an _excellent_ card, but expensive. If you don't need to do
> > any sim modeling, the E3D Lite is a good choice.
> >
> > Personally, I have a C3Ds3 in my Ultra 60, just 'cuz it's UPA and not
> > PCI. I want to use that UPA slot for _something_! :-)
> >
> > If you can point me in the direction of some benchmarks, I'd be more
> > than happy to run them against both cards....
> >
> > --DM
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 6
> > From: "johnlee" <johnlee at sc23.sc.mcel.mot.com>
> > To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:11:40 +0800
> > Subject: [SunHELP] Newbie question about GCC
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I am a beginner with the GCC. I used my gcc2.95.2 on my Solaris7
>workstation
> > to compile a GNU source package(Gcc2.95.3) and got the following errors:
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Undefined symbol first referenced in file
> > sfsync makeinfo.o
> > sfvsprintf makeinfo.o
> > _stdfprintf makeinfo.o
> > sfstdout makeinfo.o
> > sfsscanf makeinfo.o
> > sfclose makeinfo.o
> > sfvprintf makeinfo.o
> > _sfflsbuf makeinfo.o
> > _stdfopen makeinfo.o
> > _stdsprintf makeinfo.o
> > sfstderr makeinfo.o
> > _stdprintf makeinfo.o
> > sfpurge makeinfo.o
> > _stdfread makeinfo.o
> > _stdfwrite makeinfo.o
> > _sffilbuf makeinfo.o
> > sfstdin makeinfo.o
> > sfseek makeinfo.o
> > ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to makeinfo
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > *** Error code 1
> > make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `makeinfo'
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Seems it is a library problem But I don't know how to deal with it. Can
> > anybody point me on this ? Thanks very much.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > John
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 7
> > From: "Martin Walter" <solaris at fue-gmbh.com>
> > To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:19:07 +0100
> > Subject: [SunHELP] ide harddisk on ultra10
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > i wanted to format a IBM IC35L040AVER07-0 harddisk (40GB ATA 100) in an
>Sun
> > Ultra 10 workstation.
> > With the format tool of Solaris 2.7 the disk is recognized as
>IC35L040AVER07-0
> > with 6,85GB.
> >
> > Then i formated it on a pc with Partition Magic.
> > On pc there are 39 GB.
> >
> > Can anyone help me to get the remaining 33 GB?
> >
> > Thanks for help
> > Martin Walter
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 8
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:49:23 -0600
> > From: "Robert Banniza" <RPBanniz at ascensionhealth.org>
> > To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Subject: [SunHELP] Changing passwords through remote SSH command???
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > I'm authenticating off of keys using SSH. I want to change my password
> > on a machine remotely by saying 'ssh robert at server "passwd robert"' but
> > I never get prompted for password change information. Rather, my prompt
> > comes back to me as though nothing happened. How can I do this remotely
> > without using an expect script?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Robert
> >
> > Robert Banniza
> > Senior UNIX Administrator
> > Ascension Health
> > Phone: 812-228-2157
> >
> > NOTE: This e-mail message may contain information that may be
>privileged,
> > confidential, and exempt from disclosure. It is intended for use only
>by
> > the person to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message in
> > error, please do not forward or use this information in any way, delete
>it
> > immediately, and contact the sender as soon as possible by the reply
>option
> > or by telephone at the telephone number listed (if available). Thank
>you.
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 9
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:14:17 -0500 (EST)
> > From: Dale Ghent <daleg at elemental.org>
> > To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> > Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Changing passwords through remote SSH command???
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Robert Banniza wrote:
> >
> > | I'm authenticating off of keys using SSH. I want to change my password
> > | on a machine remotely by saying 'ssh robert at server "passwd robert"'
>but
> > | I never get prompted for password change information. Rather, my
>prompt
> > | comes back to me as though nothing happened. How can I do this
>remotely
> > | without using an expect script?
> >
> > try:
> >
> > ssh -t robert at server 'passwd robert'
> >
> > /dale
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 10
> > From: "Peter Stokes" <peter at ashlyn.co.uk>
> > To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
> > Subject: RE: [SunHELP] ide harddisk on ultra10
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:16:09 -0000
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > You will probably need to upgrade to Sol 8.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org [mailto:sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org]On
> > Behalf Of Martin Walter
> > Sent: 24 January 2002 15:19
> > To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> > Subject: [SunHELP] ide harddisk on ultra10
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > i wanted to format a IBM IC35L040AVER07-0 harddisk (40GB ATA 100) in an
>Sun
> > Ultra 10 workstation.
> > With the format tool of Solaris 2.7 the disk is recognized as
> > IC35L040AVER07-0
> > with 6,85GB.
> >
> > Then i formated it on a pc with Partition Magic.
> > On pc there are 39 GB.
> >
> > Can anyone help me to get the remaining 33 GB?
> >
> > Thanks for help
> > Martin Walter
> > _______________________________________________
> > SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 11
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:29:45 -0500
> > From: s at avoidant.org
> > Organization: Robots from Mars
> > To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> > Subject: Re: [SunHELP] ide harddisk on ultra10
> > Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> >
> > Martin Walter wrote:
> >
> > > Can anyone help me to get the remaining 33 GB?
> >
> > Yeah, upgrade to Sol8. As far as I recall, 7 doesn't do big IDE drives.
> >
> > ---sambo
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> > http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
> >
> > End of SunHELP Digest
>
>--
>----------------------------------------------------------
>Lava Pandurangam
>
>100 Lake Forest Boulevard
>Gaithersburg, MD 20877 E-mail: vlkumar at hns.com
>----------------------------------------------------------
>_______________________________________________
>SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
>http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
Jarrett Carver http://www.geocities.com/solarboyz1
solarboyz1 at hotmail.com Unix/NT Systems Administrator
___________________________________________________________
"When people sigh 'Life is hard', I am always tempted to
ask 'compared to what?'".
- Sydney Harris
____________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the SunHELP
mailing list