[SunHELP] auth.crit : login incorret
Tayde, Umesh (CAP, GEFA, Contractor)
sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Mon Nov 5 09:19:05 CST 2001
Hi Admins,
Getting some strange error for a user login. I resetted the password =
and try
to login.. but getting the following error in messages file :
login: [ID 468494 auth.crit] login account failure: Permission denied
Will appreciate the help !!!
Thanx and Regards=A0=A0=20
-Umesh=20
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20
=A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Umesh Tayde=20
Unix System Administrator=20
(Patni Computer Systems Ltd.)=20
Consultant :=20
GE Financial Assurance=20
Richmond, VA - USA=20
Phone : 804-662-2790=20
Dialcomm : 8*662-2790=20
E-mail : umesh.tayde at gecapital.com=20
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20
-----Original Message-----
From: sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org [mailto:sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 2:22 AM
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: SunHELP digest, Vol 1 #1370 - 17 msgs
Send SunHELP mailing list submissions to
sunhelp at sunhelp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
sunhelp-request at sunhelp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
sunhelp-admin at sunhelp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SunHELP digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Those damn ^M's (Dale Ghent)
2. Re: Ultra 1 or multimple CPUs on a Sparc20? (steve price)
3. Re: restricting "su" access (Jan Johansson)
4. RE: restricting "su" access (Fletcher, Joe)
5. Re: restricting "su" access (James)
6. Largest HD on Ultra10 (Mark Sailer)
7. Re: Document management system (Ahmed Afrose)
8. solaris install over NFS (Ismail Shafi)
9. Re: restricting "su" access (Bashar)
10. Re: Re: Ultra10 processor (s at avoidant.org)
11. lists back up! (Bill Bradford)
12. Re: Too many files open ? (Michael Karl)
13. RE: Largest HD on Ultra10 (Kevin Reichhart)
14. Solaris Date commands (Gavin Winter)
15. Re: Solaris Date commands (Will Mc Donald)
16. Re: 'make' problems (compliation problems?) (Solaris Neophyte)
17. RE: Solaris Date commands (nathan.nichols at cicadacorp.com)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 13:05:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Dale Ghent <daleg at elemental.org>
To: SunHelp <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Those damn ^M's
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, John_Kennedy wrote:
| I know this is an easy one but I just can't think at the moment...
| What is the easiest way to get rid of those anoying ^M (<control>-M)
| chararacters.
solaris comes with the 'dos2unix' commmand that'll strip these out.
/dale
--__--__--
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 08:57:38 -0800 (PST)
From: steve price <sdp6513050 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Ultra 1 or multimple CPUs on a Sparc20?
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Cc: solarisneophyte at yahoo.com
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
i've got a nice ultra 1 that's looking for a new home
<grin>
--- Solaris Neophyte <solarisneophyte at yahoo.com>
wrote:
>=20
> Which would be a better bet for running solaris? A
> low end Ultra 1 or a Sparc
> 20 loaded with a dual or quad processor setup?
>=20
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find a job, post your resume.
> http://careers.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
--__--__--
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 21:16:48 +0100
From: Jan Johansson <janj-sunhelp at wenf.org>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] restricting "su" access
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 02:37:56AM -0800, Solaris Neophyte wrote:
>
>Ther's something I really like on my FreeBSD box that I haven't seen
>implemented on Solaris.
>
>Only people belonging to the "wheel" on FreeBSD can "su" to root.
>
>Is there anyway to set the same thing up with my Solaris machine?
>
>Would i change the ownership and then change the access rights or
something?
I think you want sudo, no more sharing a root pass.
http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/
--__--__--
Message: 4
From: "Fletcher, Joe" <joe.fletcher at Metapack.com>
To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: RE: [SunHELP] restricting "su" access
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 14:59:04 -0000=20
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
FWIW
Tru64 is similar to FreeBSD in the sense that unless you are in group =
system
you can't su to root.
-----Original Message-----
From: Will Yardley [mailto:william+sun at hq.newdream.net]
Sent: 3 November 2001 10:42
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] restricting "su" access
Solaris Neophyte wrote:
>=20
> Ther's something I really like on my FreeBSD box that I haven't seen
> implemented on Solaris.
>=20
> Only people belonging to the "wheel" on FreeBSD can "su" to root.
>=20
> Is there anyway to set the same thing up with my Solaris machine?
AFAIK this is only really possible on freebsd, although you could make =
a
group called 'deny' and add all the users you don't want to su to it...
then chgrp deny /usr/bin/su and chmod 4505 it
even if 'other' has read and write permissions on it, those in the =
group
'deny' shouldn't be able to access it (that's how it works on most *nix
operating systems anyway from what i've been told).
your mileage may vary.....
w
--=20
GPG Public Key:
http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/
_______________________________________________
SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
MetaPack
The Lightwell=20
12/16 Laystall Street=20
Clerkenwell=20
London EC1R 4PF=20
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7843 6720=20
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7843 6721
------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
This email is confidential and proprietary;=20
all information contained in it must be used only by the addressee in
accordance with MetaPack's terms of business and non-disclosure =
agreement.=20
Disclosure, copying, and distribution to, or use by, anyone other than =
the
intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
--__--__--
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:48:38 -0600
From: James <oneiros at darkspire.net>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] restricting "su" access
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Thus spake Solaris Neophyte (solarisneophyte at yahoo.com):
> Ther's something I really like on my FreeBSD box that I haven't seen
> implemented on Solaris.
>=20
> Only people belonging to the "wheel" on FreeBSD can "su" to root.
>=20
> Is there anyway to set the same thing up with my Solaris machine?
There's a pam_wheel module for solaris. Works well.
The author's site seems to be gone atm, so I've put it up at:
<http://oneiros.darkspire.net/solaris/pam_wheel-1.3.tar.gz>
<http://oneiros.darkspire.net/solaris/pam_wheel-1.3.tar.gz.asc>
If you're looking to allow certain people access to specific commands =
and
arguments that need to be run as root, check out sudo.
HTH
--=20
James <oneiros at darkspire.net> 1024D/62C2F77D
uri: http://oneiros.darkspire.net/ EBB8 AF14 8C43 2F12 7623
irc: EFnet / opn / tietnet C0AA C0AE 56D4 62C2 F77D
--__--__--
Message: 6
From: "Mark Sailer" <n2jtw at yahoo.com>
To: "Sunhelp" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 20:38:09 -0500
Subject: [SunHELP] Largest HD on Ultra10
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Has anyone be able to determine what is the largest IDE HD that a Ultra =
10
will support?
I'm running a 40gig right now and need more space.
Do the 60g, 80g or 100g work????
Thanks
Mark
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--__--__--
Message: 7
From: Ahmed Afrose <ahmed.afrose at siemens.co.ae>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2001 11:06:56 +0400
Subject: [SunHELP] Re: Document management system
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------70782838EFD21FEA92B9F46F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi everyone,
I wonder if anyone knows of a freeware doucment management system (like
Xerox - DocuShare) on Solaris. I need it to add more access control to
files/directories in addition to normal permissions and ACL's on
solaris.
//
--------------70782838EFD21FEA92B9F46F
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=3Dus-ascii;
name=3D"ahmed.afrose.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Ahmed Afrose
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=3D"ahmed.afrose.vcf"
begin:vcard=20
n:Afrose;Ahmed
tel;cell:+971 50 5356610
tel;fax:+971 4 331 9547
tel;work:+971 4 331 9578
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.siemens.com
org:Siemens
adr:;;;Dubai;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:ahmed.afrose at siemens.co.ae
title:Systems Engineer
fn:Ahmed Afrose
end:vcard
--------------70782838EFD21FEA92B9F46F--
--__--__--
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 23:42:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Ismail Shafi <mw_salman at yahoo.com>
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: [SunHELP] solaris install over NFS
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Is there anyway to install solaris 7 or 8 over from a
NFS server or a ftp server ?
my clients dont have cdrom & my Servers are Win2000...
acting as a NFS & FTP server .
thanks
Ismail
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
--__--__--
Message: 9
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 11:13:54 +0300 (AST)
From: Bashar <big at kuwaitnet.net>
To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] restricting "su" access
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
vi /etc/group and add your self to the root group , say your usernae is
big your root group line should be
root::0:root,big,anyotheradmin
save and exit and try to open new session and su from non-root group =
user
and a root-group user
chgrp root /usr/bin/su && chmod 750 /usr/bin/su
or you can just add your self to sys grop and chmod 750 to
/usr/bin/su while su yas root:sys user:group
KuwaitNet Communications Inc.
Bashar A AlAbdulhadi UNIX Systems Administrator
bashar at kuwaitnet.net http://www.KuwaitNet.net
Phone: (KW) +965-2647060 Fax: (KW) +965-5337060
Phone: (KW) +965-807060 Fax: (US) +801-4373934
ICQ UIN: 19907999 Pager: (KW) 9327060
IRC: Big @ #Kuwaitnet YaHoO ID: kuwaitnets
"Quality, Stability, 24 Hours Tech. Support"
"Think KuwaitNet"
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Jan Johansson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 02:37:56AM -0800, Solaris Neophyte wrote:
> >
> >Ther's something I really like on my FreeBSD box that I haven't seen
> >implemented on Solaris.
> >
> >Only people belonging to the "wheel" on FreeBSD can "su" to root.
> >
> >Is there anyway to set the same thing up with my Solaris machine?
> >
> >Would i change the ownership and then change the access rights or
something?
>
> I think you want sudo, no more sharing a root pass.
>
> http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
>
--__--__--
Message: 10
From: s at avoidant.org
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2001 07:27:58 -0500
Organization: Robots from Mars
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Re: Ultra10 processor
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
steve price wrote:
> didn't you say a while back that you needed a
> processor? I have in my hand a 360mhh for a 5/10.
> i'm sending it back to the guy i bought it from since
> he sent me the wrong thing - do you want it ?
Damn, damn, damn. I just bought one on ebay that should be here Any Day
Now. Just out of curiousity, how much would you have wanted for it? I
paid $150.
---sambo
--__--__--
Message: 11
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 13:12:36 -0600
From: Bill Bradford <mrbill at mrbill.net>
To: geeks at mrbill.net, rescue at mrbill.net, sunhelp at mrbill.net
Subject: [SunHELP] lists back up!
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
New server in place, lists back up. Life is good so far.
Bill
--=20
Bill Bradford
mrbill at mrbill.net
Austin, TX
--__--__--
Message: 12
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2001 21:45:22 +0100
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Too many files open ?
From: Michael Karl <mk at lexcom-net.de>
To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Hey Nicholas,
I'm also wondering about this hard crash without any messages.
But many Apples connected via Helios-EtherShare had reported the lost =
of
connection to the U2 only seconds after the message of "too many files
open". These Apples use the U2 as a time-server.
What do you think is/was real problem ?
Regards
Michael Karl
> Von: Nicholas Dronen <ndronen at frii.com>
> Antworten an: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Datum: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:13:25 -0700
> An: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
> Betreff: Re: [SunHELP] Too many files open ?
>=20
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:54:11AM +0100, Michael Karl wrote:
>> Thanx to all
>>=20
>> specially to f_balta at hotmail.com and Dominik Guennel.
>>=20
>> The following /etc/system-parameters must be set higher:
>>=20
>> set rlim_fd_cur =3D 512
>> set rlim_fd_max =3D 2048
>>=20
>> I set this parameters this night and it seems to be working.
>=20
> He's right about this, but beware that the "Too many open
> files" error you saw was not the cause of the original hang.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Nicholas Dronen
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
--__--__--
Message: 13
From: Kevin Reichhart <KReichhart at Yantra.com>
To: "'sunhelp at sunhelp.org'" <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: RE: [SunHELP] Largest HD on Ultra10
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 17:52:24 -0500=20
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
the 80gb definately does not work. i think the largest that is =
"officially"
supported is 32gb (somewhere around there). i found thisout the hard =
way
after purchasing an 80gb maxtor drive. i ended up building a linux box
around it and mounting it via nfs.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sailer [mailto:n2jtw at yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 8:38 PM
To: Sunhelp
Subject: [SunHELP] Largest HD on Ultra10
Has anyone be able to determine what is the largest IDE HD that a Ultra =
10
will support?
I'm running a 40gig right now and need more space.
Do the 60g, 80g or 100g work????
Thanks
Mark
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
--__--__--
Message: 14
From: "Gavin Winter" <gwinter at rlo.com.au>
To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:18:13 +1100
Subject: [SunHELP] Solaris Date commands
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Hello all,
I am new to shell scripting and I am attempting to solve a somewhat =
complex
problem. On our Solaris 8 box (SPARC) we have a dir with many files. =
Each
file (flat text) has, in the header record, a timestamp field =
indicating the
date/time the file was created. The files have to be processed in =
timestamp
order, i.e. oldest first. The unix timestamp against the file is not a
valid indicator of age in this case.
And example of the timestamp field is as follows...
20011025015826
(YYYYMMDDHH24MISS)
I can loop through the files easily enough, reading in the date field =
but
this make it very difficult to do comparisons between dates to find the
oldest file. I think the easiest method would be to convert the string =
to a
date format, do a comparison on the date format (perhaps using seconds =
from
1970 or similar) and proceed forthwith to date the files. However I =
cannot
find any unix commands to help me do this.
Does anyone have any advice to offer on this?
regards
Gavin Winter
--__--__--
Message: 15
From: "Will Mc Donald" <wmcdonald at orctel.co.uk>
To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] Solaris Date commands
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 01:20:41 -0000
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
man touch
You should be able to read in the time for each $file from its header, =
use
the touch command to change the unix timestamp for $file (assuming this
doesn't mess with anything else using those timestamps) then allow you =
to
process them in date format using something like ls -t to read them in =
for
instance.
Will.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gavin Winter" <gwinter at rlo.com.au>
> Hello all,
> I am new to shell scripting and I am attempting to solve a somewhat
complex
> problem. On our Solaris 8 box (SPARC) we have a dir with many files. =
Each
> file (flat text) has, in the header record, a timestamp field =
indicating
the
> date/time the file was created. The files have to be processed in
timestamp
> order, i.e. oldest first. The unix timestamp against the file is not =
a
> valid indicator of age in this case.
>
> And example of the timestamp field is as follows...
> 20011025015826
> (YYYYMMDDHH24MISS)
>
> I can loop through the files easily enough, reading in the date field =
but
> this make it very difficult to do comparisons between dates to find =
the
> oldest file. I think the easiest method would be to convert the =
string to
a
> date format, do a comparison on the date format (perhaps using =
seconds
from
> 1970 or similar) and proceed forthwith to date the files. However I =
cannot
> find any unix commands to help me do this.
>
> Does anyone have any advice to offer on this?
>
> regards
> Gavin Winter
--__--__--
Message: 16
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 18:39:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Solaris Neophyte <solarisneophyte at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] 'make' problems (compliation problems?)
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Did you manage to this this problem resolved?
-Sameer
--- Bruce Pullig <bpullig at Houston.GeoQuest.SLB.COM> wrote:
> I ran into similar errors yesterday compiling Apache with SSL. I'm =
not=20
> sure what the errors mean. If someone knows the answer, please post =
to
the=20
> list.
>=20
> At 07:19 AM 11/2/2001, you wrote:
> >/usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccy5n06u.s", line 902: error: unknown =
opcode
> >".subsection"
> >/usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccy5n06u.s", line 902: error: statement =
syntax
> >/usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccy5n06u.s", line 910: error: unknown =
opcode
> >".previous"
> >/usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccy5n06u.s", line 910: error: statement =
syntax
>=20
> --=20
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> Bruce Pullig
> Senior Systems Administrator
> Schlumberger Oil & Gas Information Solutions
> Data Management Center
> 5444 Westheimer, Suite 800, Houston, TX 77056
> Phone: 713.350.4217 Fax: 713.350.4102
> bpullig at slb.com
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
--__--__--
Message: 17
From: nathan.nichols at cicadacorp.com
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: RE: [SunHELP] Solaris Date commands
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 01:18:04 -0600=20
Reply-To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
How about:
1. Reading the timestamp in each file
2. Write out the timestamp and filename to a temp file
3. Sort the file using `sort -n` (n is for numeric, but probably =
doesn't
matter since the date string is uniform in length.
4. Use the tempfile in a loop, reading a line at a time, either =
reading the
filename into a variable using read or awk { 'print $2' } to get the
filename. Do whatever you need to do in the loop.
5. Remove the tempfile.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gavin Winter [mailto:gwinter at rlo.com.au]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 5:18 PM
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: [SunHELP] Solaris Date commands
Hello all,
I am new to shell scripting and I am attempting to solve a somewhat =
complex
problem. On our Solaris 8 box (SPARC) we have a dir with many files. =
Each
file (flat text) has, in the header record, a timestamp field =
indicating the
date/time the file was created. The files have to be processed in =
timestamp
order, i.e. oldest first. The unix timestamp against the file is not a
valid indicator of age in this case.
And example of the timestamp field is as follows...
20011025015826
(YYYYMMDDHH24MISS)
I can loop through the files easily enough, reading in the date field =
but
this make it very difficult to do comparisons between dates to find the
oldest file. I think the easiest method would be to convert the string =
to a
date format, do a comparison on the date format (perhaps using seconds =
from
1970 or similar) and proceed forthwith to date the files. However I =
cannot
find any unix commands to help me do this.
Does anyone have any advice to offer on this?
regards
Gavin Winter
_______________________________________________
SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
SunHELP maillist - SunHELP at sunhelp.org
http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sunhelp
End of SunHELP Digest
More information about the SunHELP
mailing list