[SunHELP] Cannot establish network using GateD
Hitoshi TAKAHASHI
sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Wed May 9 06:30:26 CDT 2001
Hi James-san,
Thank you for your advice.
>first.. gated is for routing protocols, not routing (yas verginia, there is
>a difference). For a net this small you should consider static routes.
Yes.
I'd like to connect three classless netwarks,10.2.96.0/22,10.2.250.0/25 and
10.2.250.128/25, by way of Server-A and Server-B with two NICs.
PC-A __Server-A___ __Server-B___ PC-D
10.2.96.1 |EP250 | PC-B PC-C |EP250 | 10.2.250.52
__|____________|Solaris2.6 |____|_____|______|Solaris2.6 |___|__________
10.2.96.0/22 |IP Address | 10.2.250.128/25 |IP Address | 10.2.250.0/25
|10.2.96.20 | |10.2.250.130 |
|10.2.250.129 | |10.2.250.1 |
|_____________| |_____________|
Can I accomplish it only using static routes ?
(add "route add command" in S69inet file ??)
Is GateD (routing protocol) no need ?
Could you please tell me more your advice ?
>Second, if you cannot ping an interface on the SAME net, routing, routing
>protocols and default gateways mean nothing. The problem is elsewhere and
>pretty basic.
>When you have basics established (can ping interfaces on same nets), see
>the most excellent guide to adding routes in Solaris on the SunHelp Tip 'O'
>the Day archive.
Result of ping
>From Server-A
ping 10.2.96.1 ---- OK(to PC-A)
ping 10.2.250.130 ---- OK(to Server-B)
ping 10.2.250.1 ---- OK(to Server-B)
ping 10.2.250.52 ---- NG(to PC-D)
ping 10.2.250.0 ---- OK
ping 10.2.250.127 ---- OK
>From Server-B
ping 10.2.96.1 ---- NG(to PC-A)
ping 10.2.96.20 ---- OK(to Server-A)
ping 10.2.250.129 ---- OK(to Server-A)
ping 10.2.250.52 ---- OK(to PC-D)
ping 10.2.96.0 ---- OK
ping 10.2.99.255 ---- OK
Best regards,
-Hitoshi-
----------------------------------------
Hitoshi TAKAHASHI(takahasi at ntt-it.co.jp)
NTT-IT CORPORATION
TEL +81-3-3667-8155 FAX +81-3-3667-8225
More information about the SunHELP
mailing list