[Sunhelp] Problem with E220 "redundant" power supplies
Bill Bradford
mrbill at mrbill.net
Wed Jun 21 23:02:21 CDT 2000
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 08:57:45PM -0500, Tony Alberti wrote:
> How many disks were in the 220?
Two, the maximum. 18gig drives.
> I have had a similar situation on an E250.
> I asked one of the Sun FE's here in Chicago
> to explain this. I was told that the dual power
> supplies in a 250 aren't truely redundant when
> the machine is loaded. If you have two power
> supplies and only 1 internal disk, there is enough
> power in one power supply to handle the load,
> so the redundancy works. However when you
> have all 6 HDs in a 250, that second power supply
> uses about 75% of its output to drive the disk
> backplane. It is no longer redundant.
> If the machine had truely redundant power
> supplies, one could handle the load of the
> system AND all 6 disks, so all you would
> need for operation was 1, and the second
> for redundancy. Try to order an E250
> from Sun configured for 6 internal disks
> and 1 powersupply. They will NOT
> sell you that configuration. If you
> want 2 internal disks and 1 power supply,
> they will sell that to you (assuming the mainboard
> had the same loaded config of 2 400mHz CPUS and
> 2 gig memory in both configurations).
> I suspect something similar probably occured in your 220.
> Although there are less internal disks in a 220, perhaps the
> power supplies are less as well.
> Tony
Thanks for the note, helps explain that I'm *not* going crazy.
Bill
--
+-------------------\ /-----------------+
| Bill Bradford | www.sunhelp.org |
| mrbill at mrbill.net | www.decvax.org |
| Austin, Texas USA | www.pdp11.org |
+-------------------/ \-----------------+
More information about the SunHELP
mailing list