[Sunhelp] Specs on GDM20E20 versus GDM20D10?
Bill Bradford
mrbill at mrbill.net
Thu Dec 30 03:22:35 CST 1999
On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 12:47:27AM -0800, James Lockwood wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Bill Bradford wrote:
> > Anybody know the detailed specs on a GDM20E20, compared to a GDM20D10?
> > I'm convinced that the '20 has .25 dot pitch, compared to the '10's .31;
> > I just replaced my '10 with a '20 and everything is much smaller and
> > sharper... (wow, I love this monitor..)
> Nope, both have a .31 _stripe_ pitch (which is comparable to a 0.26-0.28
> dot pitch in image clarity). The 10's are older and usually more tired.
> A GDM-1962B will have comparable image quality in the resolutions that all
> support but will tend to go out of tune more easily. The 10 and
> especially the 20 are autotuning.
> -James
I just realized what it was - I had the PGX32 set (via GFXconfig -i) to
"default" resolution.. which on the '10 is 1152x900, but on the '20 is
1280x1024. I ran xdpyinfo, yeah, I was at 1280x1024. 8-)
I've got it set back to 1152x900x85hz for now. Man, this is nice. THe
'10 I had, had some ghosting problems (may have been the cable), but this
20 is the nicest monitor I've ever seen.
(and I can actually tell what things are set at, with proper onscreen
display, instead of that damned remote..)
Bill
--
+-----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|Bill Bradford | mrbill at pdp11.org | mrbill at mrbill.net |
|http://www.sunhelp.org | http://www.pdp11.org | http://www.mrbill.net|
+-----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
More information about the SunHELP
mailing list