[rescue] Mozilla Firefox
Kevin Loch
kloch at gurunet.net
Thu Apr 22 13:26:59 CDT 2004
Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> Thu, 22 Apr 2004 @ 00:17 -0400, Kevin Loch said:
>
>
> That seems like an awful waste of bandwidth.
>
The disk cache is redundant since the memory cache is
still in use. On a fast internet connection and a machine
without extra fast SCSI disk, downloading from the net
is noticably faster than fetching from disk.
Especially with large caches containing thousands
of files.
I also believe in the "everything is purged
when I exit". That is why I set cookies
to expire at end of session too.
>>and ALWAYS disable open links in background. That is likely the
>>problem you are having.
>
>
> I don't see any reason why it would use more memory.
>
Downloading all that content in the background is certainly
going to consume resources. Bandwidth, memory, disk IO (if
disk caching is enabled).
> It is a UI issue: it means that opening a new tab leaves you in your
> current tab.
>
No, even within a single tab accessing lots of large images will
grow memory usage dramatically. This is another reason
to disable background fetching.
More information about the rescue
mailing list