[rescue] SunFastEthernet questions

[Curtis H. Wilbar Jr.]

Simple... asking questions is what has allowed me to learn what I've
learned and given me the skills I have....

All indications are that my network stays at 100 base FULL steady without
errors and without renegotiations.... so.... from a pure numbers and
theory standpoint locking my hme to 100 base FULL should offer not
improvement whatsoever....  if it does (and I will have to try it) then
I'd really like to know why.

-- Curt


>Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:31:03 -0500
>From: "Jonathan C. Patschke" <jp at celestrion.net>
>To: The Rescue List <rescue at sunhelp.org>
>Subject: Re: [rescue] SunFastEthernet questions
>X-Message-Flag: Microsoft Outlook is an insecure piece of crap.  Please 
consider using a different email client.
>X-All-Your-Base: Are Belong To Us
>X-GPG-Keyserver: keys.celestrion.net
>X-GPG-Fingerprint: 143B 8D8C 5AD7 44D4 0143  FE85 288C 370B 67B9 A022
>
>On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote:
>
>> I'm no physical ethernet expert, but the only explanations I
>> could come up with (constant renegotiation, actual errors, etc)
>
>Constant renegotiation is the best I can come up with.
>
>> are all disproved by the information I've looked at that indicates
>> I'm at 100MB full clean with no errors or rengotiations.... so
>> I'm drawing a blank as to how it could effect it...  I may
>> simpy have to experiment...
>
>Have you tried it both ways?  If one way is faster, why ask any more
>questions? :)
>
>-- 
>Jonathan Patschke   )  "Gamer weenies...are the sludge at the bottom
>Elgin, TX          (    of the user swamp."           --Gary Nichols
>_______________________________________________
>rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue


Curtis Wilbar
Hawk Mountain Networks
rescue at hawkmountain.net

My e-mail is protected against viruses and spam by MailGuardian
                  http://www.mailguardian.net
          Top notch protection at unbelievable prices