[rescue] Perverse Question

[Robert Novak]

On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, KRM wrote:

> Where's the roster for this "group" :)  I need to ensure that my name is
> no where near it.

I've moved your name to the top, in Zapf Chancery to boot.

Which currently available-at-retail MS OS is more stable than Win2k? Note
I'm not comparing it to any UNIX, so smartass answers like "FreeBSD" are
just wrong. =)

[I know, you're just trolling... no answer needed =_) ]

--Rob
> Lionel Peterson wrote:
>
> >Naw, Win2K is considered by "the group" to be a workable MS OS for some
> >applications, esp. those that will run in no other environment...
> >
> >Besides, it is what runs on some of those nice SunPCi cards ;^)

-- 
Robert Novak - rnovak at indyramp.com