[rescue] OS X and dual CPU machines?

[Michael Schiller]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 12:30 AM, N.Miller wrote:

> I would not consider the iMac--definitely go with the dual.  With the 
> dual proc, you can do much more by way of upgrades if you decide you 
> like it (like get faster processors! :-).  The iMac is very 
> restrictive as to potential upgrades.  The nice thing about Mac 
> desktops is that they are very upgradeable.  I had a 7600 (at least an 
> 8 yo computer) running OS 9 very happily.  G3 daughter card + Voodoo 3 
> PCI.  Maybe $300 in it (two years ago).

Well, I already HAVE a 17" iMac that I bought brand new a few months 
ago. I also just bought a dual 500 powermac on ebay (tonight, for more 
than I care to admit :) ) so I should be able to let everyone know 
which system is faster in a few days :)

- -Mike
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*
* PGP fingerprint= D2 4F A8 B7 13 D5 73 1E  48 99 40 99 F9 BC 74 74 *
* Email:schiller at nospam.agrijag.com \|||/    http://www.agrijag.com *
*                                   (o o)                           *
*--------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo------------------------*

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQCVAwUBPuRNn/2pN+wZQzqRAQGh1gP/cnTuZKr7ItKmW1ArCZ07JNn9pou52Hiv
HSK6S//G9ReTpJpbZEIBrkJXeARedIWLuKmcxVd4U+1z0RPvoWfAwc4rnyOq1scZ
xDT4t0DNvK0pAceCyioE6saI3dbPpXHJTvK9EdKS2DFxdY5E9oEPp96byGsczi/Y
gPQtVn1K8Q8=
=4pSw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----