[rescue] Sun Blade 100 Question - IDE

[Shawn Wallbridge]

Or you can get the 8 port 3Ware cards with 8-160GB drives and get 1120GB of
storage. Works pretty good. We even have a machine with two 8 port cards.

shawn

-----Original Message-----
From: rescue-admin at sunhelp.org [mailto:rescue-admin at sunhelp.org]On
Behalf Of Joshua D Boyd
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:00 PM
To: rescue at sunhelp.org
Subject: Re: [rescue] Sun Blade 100 Question - IDE


On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 03:15:16PM -0500, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:25:18PM -0400, Kurt Huhn wrote:
> > > Kurt, IDE == Broken technology.  Adding another disk can very well
> > > decrease performance on an IDE system, if both drives are on the same
> > > bus (cable).
> >
> > Bah!  It's CRAP!  Obviously not Scottish...
> >
> > Here I was thinking that a couple cheap IDE dries in a P200 systems
> > would make a decent fileserver.  Screw that.  Looks like I'll be keeping
> > the Adaptec SCSI card and using more SCSI disks...
>
> Most systems have at least 2 IDE channels.  Put one drive on each channel.

Buy a mobo with 4 IDE chanels.  CD-Rom on one, burner on one, two hard
drives
then add a pair of 3ware cards (4 chanels each, accelerated, with linux
support).  That will allow you 10 hard drives.  Assuming two boot drives,
that gives you 2 raid 5s to stripe.  So easily a terabyte, but with raid,
probably only 640 megs of bullet proof storage.

Under certain circumstances, the stupidity of IDE becomes a question not of
will it degrade your performance, but rather are you going to put up with
it?  For instance, point to point FastE is, to my understanding, just as
fast
as FDDI, but you still just know it is inferior.  Under some circumstances,
IDE is just as fast and data safe as scsi, but still, you just know it is
inferior.

--
Joshua D. Boyd

Social Security - I have greater faith that Elvis is alive
and programming VAX assembler than that I will ever receive
a dime from it.  --  Patrick Giagnocavo