[rescue] Energy
Kyle Webb
kylewebb at beckman.uiuc.edu
Thu May 9 19:14:51 CDT 2002
At 02:52 PM 5/9/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >In the past three hundred years we have come up with precisely three ways
> >for generating electricity. Interesting chemical reactions, smashing
> >crystals, and moving magnets near each other.
>
>Seebeck effect? (AKA thermocouples). Isn't that how the RTGs used on
>deep-space sats work?
Photoelectric effect (solar cells).
Atomic battery effect (not sure what the proper name for it is) where you
use radioactive emission of charged particles to directly create a current
(alpha, beta or positron emitters).
Triboelectric effect (static from friction)
MHD generators (uses the plasma itself as the conductor moving through the
magnetic field, though somewhat close to a standard generator in concept).
One other point is that there are a number of aneutronic fusion reaction
paths, albeit they aren't leading candidates for power generation at the
moment.
Sadly, I must agree that fusion seems to be a ways off. It's been "just
around the corner" for quite a long time, and IMHO will continue that way
for a time yet.
Kyle Webb
More information about the rescue
mailing list