[rescue] Sun 711

Shawn Wallbridge swallbridge at franticfilms.com
Wed May 1 19:48:39 CDT 2002


That's the thing. We do use LZW compression, but I think streaming it at a
high enough rate would be very CPU intensive.

Don't forget, I am just the sysadmin. I only know what I have picked up by
osmosis.

shawn



-----Original Message-----
From: rescue-admin at sunhelp.org [mailto:rescue-admin at sunhelp.org]On
Behalf Of Joshua D Boyd
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:34 PM
To: rescue at sunhelp.org
Subject: Re: [rescue] Sun 711


On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:22:20PM -0500, Shawn Wallbridge wrote:
> As soon as we compress the video, the whole project goes out the window.
We
> are trying to get as high of quality image as possible. It can not be
> compressed at all. We are trying to minimize filmouts (sending data files
> (10bit Cineons) down to LA, having them output to film (with a laser,
cool!)
> and renting a theater to watch them at about $5k each time).

Strickly speaking, compression != lossy compression.  Practically, I don't
know that gziping every frame would help enough, and or be fast enough.




--
Joshua D. Boyd



More information about the rescue mailing list