[rescue] appropriate subjects

[Derrick D. Daugherty]

It's rumored that around Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 11:48:07PM -0500
Mike Nicewonger <twmaster at twmaster.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, you wrote:
> > It's rumored that around Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 11:20:59PM -0500
> > bill pointon <wpointon at earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>When was it announced?  I could have made it.
> > > >>
> > > >3-4 days ago. You really need toread the threads.
> > > >
> > > >Besides, it is David P's fault :)
> > > >
> > > >Mike N
> > 
> > on a similar note... tonight steven mentioend he needed sources of
> > neg48dc power...i never read that post since the subject was prolly off
> > and i wasn't following that thread.  i coulda saved him 1k...i have
> > piles of the kit he needed.
> 
> David Passmore's original message regarding the Q and geeking was on topic.

I wasn't complaining about this one :)  just that 90% of time we all go
off on tangents and the subject doesn't follow ;)  I know I'm guilty
as well..just tossing it out there so maybe someone would consider
changing the subject :)  in mutt it takes less than two seconds...

s ^U <type new subject> return y

> > so you kids start updating your subjects or I'll keep bitchin'
> 
> Bitch away :)

Try and stop me :D  I'm if I whine enough I'm sure to  see several plonk's
popping up.

If anyone was wondering, I just burped, and the BBQ still tastes good :D

^D

--
this .signature intentionaly left blank